基于第三方评价数据的国家临床医学研究中心依托单位遴选方法构建

Construction of a selection method for supporting institutions of national clinical medical research centers based on third-party evaluation data

目的探索利用第三方评价数据构建国家临床医学研究中心依托单位的遴选方法。方法以重大疾病领域已布局的国家临床医学研究中心的数量≥5家,非重大疾病领域已布局的数量≥3家为标准遴选疾病领域/临床专科为研究对象。从中国医学科学院医学信息研究所官方网站收集中国医院科技量值排行榜数据,从复旦大学官方网站收集中国医院及专科声誉排行榜中的专科科研标化值排行数据。根据疾病领域/临床专科与两大排行榜的学科和专科的对应关系,分别选取相应疾病领域/临床专科在两个榜单中排前5名和前10名的医院,采用等级赋分法计算纳入医院的综合分值并据此进行排名,然后以全覆盖已认定的国家临床医学研究中心依托单位为标准确定应遴选的医院数量。结果以慢性肾病、妇产疾病、消化系统疾病、口腔疾病、血液系统疾病、眼耳鼻喉疾病这6个疾病领域/临床专科为研究对象,在纳入两个排行榜的前5家医院所形成的医院排行名单中,最多需要纳入前11家医院方可全覆盖已认定的依托单位,而纳入排行榜的前10家医院所形成的医院排行名单中,最多纳入前6家医院即可实现全覆盖。因此,纳入两个榜单中排前10名的医院计算其综合分值,并将综合分值排前6名的医院作为遴选出的医院是最优的遴选方法。结论基于第三方评价数据的遴选方法具有一定的科学性和可靠性,可为国家临床医学研究中心管理部门的评审工作提供参考。

Objective To explore the method of selecting the supporting institutions of the national clinical medical research center by using the third-party evaluation data.Methods Select disease fields/clinical specialties as research objects based on the criteria of having at least 5 national clinical research centers established in the field of major diseases and at least 3 established in the field of non major diseases.Collected data on the ranking of scientific and technological evaluation metrics in Chinese hospitals from the official website of the Institute of Medical Information,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,and collected standardized research value ranking data on the reputation ranking of Chinese hospitals and specialties from the official website of Fudan University.Based on the correspondence between the disease field/clinical specialty and the disciplines and specialties in the two major rankings,the top 5 and top 10 hospitals in the corresponding disease fields/clinical specialties in the two ranking lists were selected respectively,and the comprehensive scores of the included hospitals were calculated using the grade scoring method and ranked accordingly.Then,determine the number of hospitals to be selected based on the criteria of fully covering the recognized national clinical medical research centers supporting institutions.Results The study focused on six disease fields/clinical specialties,including chronic kidney disease,obstetrics and gynecology,digestive system diseases,oral diseases,hematological diseases,and eye,ear,nose,and throat diseases.In the hospital ranking list formed by the top 5 hospitals included in the two rankings,a maximum of 11 hospitals needed to be included to fully cover the recognized supporting institutions,while in the hospital ranking list formed by the top 10 hospitals included in the rankings,a maximum of 6 hospitals needed to be included to achieve full coverage.Therefore,the optimal selection method was to include the top 10 hospitals in the two rankings and calculate their comprehensive scores,and select the top 6 hospitals based on their comprehensive scores.Conclusions The selection method based on the third-party evaluation data is scientific and reliable,and can provide reference for the evaluation work of the management department of the national clinical medical research center.