司法制约职务犯罪监察调查的逻辑定位与法治路径

The Logical Positioning and Legal Path of Judicial Checks on the Supervision-based Investigation of Public Duty-r elated Crimes

在职务犯罪监察与司法二元治理模式下,监察调查作为职务犯罪诉讼案件的前置程序,有可能形成主导职务犯罪办理全局的监察中心主义倾向,影响以审判为中心的刑事诉讼职能的实现。对此,需要加强司法对监察调查的制约机制。司法制约监察的目标应定位为监察机关不得妨碍审判权、检察权的依法独立行使;防止其不当介入司法机关对职务犯罪案件的审查活动。在程序调控层面,应将监察机关的强制措施建议权形塑为一项配合机制,强化对庭外核实技术调查类证据建议权的程序控制,合理规制情况说明的适用范围。在制度保障层面,须强化职务犯罪监察干预司法过程的法律控制,消弭监察监督与司法监督的内在张力,完善职务犯罪案件证人出庭作证的保障性规则。

Under the dual governance model of supervision and justice of public duty-related crime,the supervision-based investigation as the pre-procedure of public duty-related crime litigation cases may form the supervision-centralist tendency that the supervision-based investigation leads the whole picture of handling public duty-related crimes,affecting the realization of the function of litigation centered on trial.In this regard,it is necessary to strengthen the judicial check mechanism on supervision-based investigation.The objective of judicial checks on supervision should be pinpointed as forbidding the supervisory organ from hindering the independent exercise of judicial and procuratorial power according to law and preventing it from improperly intervening in the judicial organs'examination of public duty-related criminal cases.At the level of procedural control,it is necessary to shape the supervisory organ's right to propose compulsory measures into a cooperative mechanism,strengthen the procedural control of the right to propose out-of-court verification of evidences typed as technical investigation,and reasonably regulate the application scope of the situation statement.At the level of system guarantee,it is necessary to strengthen the legal control of the interference of public duty-related crimes supervision in the judicial process,eliminate the inherent tension between supervisory oversight and judicial oversight,and improve rules on guaranteeing witness testimony in public duty-related criminal cases.