“见微知著”与“本末悉究”——“微舞评”写作探析

On the Writing of“Micro Dance Criticism”

“微舞评”之“微”在于其简短的体量,并不意味其简单的内涵,传统舞评之“传统”也并不在于评论内容的全览,两者之间是风格上的差异而不是层次上的高低。“微”之于“著”,在于“微舞评”何以在有限的体量中发挥出多限度的内容与表达;“本”“末”悉究在“微舞评”的书写范式中更强调“转译”“转化”的方法。“本”是其作为评论的功能和价值,“末”在于其评论的内容与形式,两者同出一名,共同标定着“微舞评”的写作特点。

The“micro dance criticism”emphasizes the“micro”in its brief volume,which does not imply the simplification of its connotations.The“tradition”of traditional dance criticism lies not in a panoramic presentation of the content,but in their stylized writing style and mode of dissemination.Their differences depend on style rather than quality.To observe“whole”through“micro”,a“micro dance criticism”should convey a wide range of content and expressions within a limited volume;the“beginning”and the“end”writing paradigm of“micro dance criticism”stresses the methods of“translation”and“transformation”.The“beginning”emphasizes the function and value of criticism,while the“end”focuses on its content and form,both of which together define the writing characteristics of“micro dance criticism”.