现行国内仲裁裁决不予执行制度的实证研究——兼论我国仲裁司法审查制度的重构

An Empirical Study on the Current System of Non-enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards-On the Reconstruction of China's Arbitration Judicial Examination System

我国仲裁司法审查制度中的双重审查机制对仲裁快捷性、权威性和公正性的损害常为人诟病,如何处理这一问题成为本次《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》修改必须回应的重要议题,而其中极为重要的正是对仲裁裁决不予执行制度的重新审视。本文采用实证研究方法,发现针对我国国内仲裁裁决的不予执行程序不仅在救济作用方面极为有限且不够均衡,甚至还有被申请主体滥用以拖延裁决执行的弊端。鉴于此,笔者认为应当废除国内仲裁裁决不予执行制度,重构我国的仲裁司法审查制度。

The damage of the dual examination mechanism in China's Arbitration Judicial Examination System to the rapidity,authority and impartiality of arbitration is often criticized.How to deal with this problem has become an important issue that must be responded to in the revision of Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law of PRC.What needs to be solved urgently is the survey of the Non-enforcement System of arbitral awards.Using the empirical research method,this article finds that the Non-enforcement System of domestic arbitral awards is not only limited and unbalanced in the judicial remedy,but also abused by the applicants to delay the execution of the awards.In view of this,the Non-enforcement System of domestic arbitral awards should be abolished and China's Arbitration Judicial Examination System should be reconstructed.