期刊文献+

护理计划决策支持系统在新入职护士培训管理中的应用

Effects of a nursing care plan decision-making support system in the training management of newly hired nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的基于医院护理信息系统构建护理计划决策支持系统,探讨其在新入职护士中应用效果。方法本研究采用非同期前后对照研究设计。采用便利抽样法,选取首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院公开招聘的181名新入职护士为研究对象,将2021年8月入职的85名新护士设为对照组,2022年8月入职的96名新护士设为干预组。对照组采用传统的培训方式;干预组在对照组基础上,通过护理计划决策支持系统进行培训。比较两组新入职护士的护理决策能力与专科护理质量。结果最终对照组纳入81名护士,干预组纳入93名护士。干预组新入职护士护理决策能力评价得分为(80.15±4.59)分,对照组新入职护士护理决策能力评价得分为(78.62±5.13)分,干预组得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.080,P=0.039)。干预组新入职护士的专科护理质量合格率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.626,P=0.036)。结论应用护理计划决策支持系统对新入职护士进行规范化培训,可以提高新入职护士的护理决策能力与专科护理质量。 ObjectiveTo build a nursing care plan decision-making support system based on the hospital's nursing information system and evaluate its effects in newly hired nurses.MethodsThis study adopted a non-synchronous pre-post control design.Totally 181 newly hired nurses recruited by Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,were selected by convenience sampling.The control group consisted of 85 new nurses hired in August 2021,while the intervention group consisted of 96 new nurses hired in August 2022.The control group received traditional training methods,while the intervention group received training through the nursing care plan decision-making support system in addition to the traditional methods.The nursing decision-making ability and the quality of specialty nursing care were compared between the two groups.ResultsFinally,81 nurses were included in the control group,and 93 nurses were included in the intervention group.The nursing decision-making ability score in the intervention group was(80.15±4.59),which was significantly higher than the(78.62±5.13)in the control group(t=-2.080,P=0.039).The intervention group also had a significantly higher qualified rate of specialty nursing care compared to the control group(χ2=6.626,P=0.036).ConclusionsThe application of the nursing care plan decision-making support system in the standardized training of newly hired nurses can improve their nursing decision-making abilities and the quality of specialty nursing care.
作者 韩丽军 蔡卫新 谢文婷 陆朋玮 李彦蓉 Han Lijun;Cai Weixin;Xie Wenting;Lu Pengwei;Li Yanrong(Department of Nursing,Bejing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100070,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2024年第22期3030-3034,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 首都医科大学燕京医学院教育教学改革研究课题(2022yjjx028)。
关键词 护理计划 决策支持 规范化培训 专科护理质量评价 Nursing care plan Decision-making support Standardized training Specialty nursing quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献152

  • 1刘晓荣,陈国良,顾仁萍,袁长蓉,孙庆文.护士排班决策支持系统模型的研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2006,23(2):7-9. 被引量:11
  • 2Kozier B, Erb G, Berman A J, et al. Fundamentals of nursing: concepts,process and practice [ M ]. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc ,2000. 253 ~ 267.
  • 3Potter PA, Perry AG. Fundamentals of nursing[ M ]. 5 th ed. Missouri:St. Louis ,2001. 273 ~ 289.
  • 4National League for Nursing. Interpretive guidelines, standards, and criteria: 1997 Council of baccalaureate, and higher degree programs [ CB/OL]. http ://www. nln. org. nlnae/guidba 07. htm
  • 5Jenkins HM. A research tool for measuring perceptions of clinical decision-making [ J ]. J Prof Nurs, 1985,1 (4) ,221 ~ 229.
  • 6American Association of Colleges of Nursing. A vision of baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: the next decade [ J ]. J Prof Nurs,1999,15 ( 1 ) :59 ~ 65.
  • 7Roche JP. A pilot study of teaching clinical decision making with the clinical educator model[ J]. J Nurs Edu ,2002,41 (8) :365 ~ 367.
  • 8王孝玲.教育测量[M]第2版[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.33-36.9295.
  • 9刘逸敏,金其林,周伟平,李蓉,魏明月,杨远.面向医学数据共享平台的协同管理架构[J].中国数字医学,2009,4(11):16-20. 被引量:5
  • 10王洪彪,张绍礼,王晓玲.运动风险决策情境中的框架效应研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2011,30(4):69-73. 被引量:7

共引文献289

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部