基于生态系统文化服务的人地关系空间重构

Spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship based on cultural ecosystem services

生态系统文化服务(CESs)作为生态系统为人类所提供的非物质裨益与福祉,具备桥接并诠释自然与人类社会复杂纽带关系的能力,其能够围绕空间需求—空间规划—空间生产,通过自上而下和自下而上的多层次干预,实现可持续发展和人类福祉提高。准确把握CESs参与人地关系空间重构实践路径,既是实现人类福祉有效提升亟需解决的科学问题,也是实现人与自然和谐共生的重要理论基础。为此,本文基于“理论解析—关联机制—实践应用—发展路径”解构方案,探讨CESs引导人地关系空间重构的内在逻辑体系与可行性。在梳理价值评估—价值权衡—“流”时期CESs研究演进历程基础上,构建CESs指导人地关系空间重构理论框架,探究其指导三生空间重构应用路径。最终,本文在数据收集、方法体系、实践应用等方面展开论述,以期实现CESs研究由理论到实践的转变,为新时期人地关系空间重构提供新视角。

Cultural ecosystem services(CESs),as the non-material benefits and well-being provided by ecosystems to humans,can bridge and interpret the complex relations between nature and human society and can be organised around"spatial needs-spatial planning-spatial production"to achieve sustainable development and human well-being through top-down and bottom-up interventions.Accurately grasping the practical path of CESs involved in the spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship is not only a scientific problem that needs to be solved to realise the effective enhancement of human well-being but also an important theoretical basis for realising the harmonious coexistence of human beings and nature.For this reason,based on the deconstruction model of"theoretical analysis-associated mechanismpractical application-development path",this study explores the inherent logical system and feasibility of CESs guiding the spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship and discusses the value assessment-value trade-offs in the process.Based on the evolution of research on CESs in the"flow"era,this study constructs a framework for CESs to guide the spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship and use it as a theoretical basis for exploring its application in guiding the spatial reconstruction of the ecological-productionliving spaces.This framework is then used to develop a program of data collection,methods system,and practical application to realise the transformation of research on CESs from theory to practice and provide new perspectives for the spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship in the new period.