隔代探望权相关纠纷规则实证研究——基于对17份裁判文书的分析

Empirical Study on Dispute Rules Related to Intergenerational Visitation Rights:Based on the Analysis of 17 Judgment Documents

探望权的现行法律规定在解决(外)祖父母隔代探望权问题上显得力不从心。以17份典型裁判文书为基础对当前纠纷解决的实践样态进行分析,总结隔代探望权纠纷的裁判思路基本契合相关法律原则,但缺少统一规制下于司法实践中凸显出的一系列实际问题。针对现存问题,积极开拓隔代探望权纠纷解决的新思路:在推进纠纷解决非诉化改革的大背景下纠正裁判者的利益考量顺序,将“未成年利益最大化原则”置于优位。同时提高裁判文书的释理性功能,并配套多元化的权利救济方式,以实现纠纷解决过程中法律与情感的和谐统一。

The current legal provisions of visitation rights are powerless to solve the problem of grandparents'intergenerational visitation rights.Based on 17 typical judgment documents,this paper analyzes the current practice pattern of dispute resolution,and concludes that the judgment of intergenerational visitation disputes basically conforms to relevant legal principles,but there are a series of practical problems highlighted in judicial practice without unified regulation.In view of the existing problems,new solution of dispute of intergenerational visitation right is actively explored.That is,in the background of promoting the reform of non-litigation dispute resolution,the order of interest consideration of the judge is corrected,and the principle of maximizing the interests of minors is placed in a superior position.At the same time,the interpretive function of judgment documents should be improved,and diversified right relief methods be provided to realize the harmonious unity of law and emotion in the process of dispute resolution.