基于知识图谱的中国生态环境治理薄弱环节识别及对策研究

Research on Identification and Countermeasures of Weak Links in China′s Ecological Environment Governance Based on Knowledge Graphs

为识别中国生态环境治理研究的薄弱环节,提出对策建议以期推动中国生态环境治理的高效提升,基于中国知网(CNKI)与Web of Science核心数据库,采用知识图谱可视化方法,系统梳理1998-2023年中国生态环境治理的发展动态和知识架构,并与国外知识体系进行比较分析,识别出中国研究的薄弱环节,并提出针对性的完善建议。结果表明:①中国生态环境治理研究经历了环境问题控制与治理策略探索、环境问题防控与治理策略优化、战略目标引领治理策略深化和生态环境保护与修复四个阶段,并呈现出以国家战略为引领,由分散向系统治理、单一主体向多元主体协同共治、传统治理向信息化治理转变的中国特质。②中国生态环境治理研究知识体系涵盖治理模式与政策、污染治理、环境治理与社会经济关联关系、绿色发展与全球治理、生态文明引领下环境治理、信息化治理六方面。③中国生态环境治理研究薄弱环节包括实践层面上的监督政策机制尚待完善、环保与经济发展协调有待加强、公众环保意识尚待提升、生态保护与修复失调以及理论层面上的简单套用国外经验、缺乏具有中国特色的综合治理体系和实践案例研究等。对比国外治理知识体系,建议未来中国生态环境治理研究从环境法律法规制度、环境治理体制机制创新和生态环境智慧治理等方面完善。

In order to improve the efficiency of ecological environment governance in China,weak links in existing research have been identified and countermeasures have been proposed.Knowledge graph visualization is used to analyze the development dynamics and knowledge structure from 1998 to 2023,sourced from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and Web of Science core databases.Comparative analysis with the international knowledge systems was also conducted.The results show that:(1)The evolution of ecological governance research in China can be divided into four stages:preliminary exploration of environmental problem control and governance strategies,optimization of pollution prevention and governance strategies,strengthening of governance strategies under strategic objectives,and ecological and environmental protection and restoration.This trajectory indicates that China′s unique governance approach has shifted from a decentralized to a systematic approach,from a singular to a multi-party stakeholder cooperation model,and from a traditional to an information centric ecological strategy.(2)The research framework of ecological governance in China includes six thematic areas:governance models and policies,pollution control,the relationship between environmental governance and socio-economic development,green development and global governance,environmental governance driven by ecological civilization,and informatization of governance processes.(3)The identified weaknesses of China´s ecological governance research include flawed supervision policies,a disconnect between environmental protection and economic growth,insufficient public awareness on environmental issues,and lack of coordination between ecological conservation and restoration.In addition,theoretical applications are often limited by excessive reliance on foreign paradigms,without sufficient contextual adaptation,resulting in a lack of comprehensive governance systems and practical case studies with Chinese characteristics.Future research in China should prioritize strengthening legal frameworks,innovating governance structures,and developing advanced solutions for intelligent ecological management.