期刊文献+

急性应激对大学生认知抑制和反应抑制的影响

Effects of acute stress on cognitive inhibition and response inhibition in college students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察现实生活中的急性应激对大学生认知抑制和反应抑制的影响。方法:招募40名参加全国研究生入学考试面试的考生,分别在面试结束后立即(应激条件)和面试结束后7个月(对照条件)完成Flanker任务和Go/Nogo双任务。采用主观应激报告量表和状态焦虑量表评估应激水平。结果:应激条件下的主观应激报告得分和状态焦虑得分(P<0.001或P<0.01)均高于对照条件。在Flanker任务中,应激条件下不一致试次的反应时快于对照条件;应激条件下的Flanker效应低于对照条件(均P<0.05)。对于Go/Nogo双任务中的探测刺激,应激条件下的Nogo探测刺激反应时及探测刺激Go/Nogo效应均大于对照条件(均P<0.05)。结论:现实生活中的急性应激可能会增强大学生对干扰物的认知抑制,但削弱其对不正确反应的抑制。 Objective:To explore the effects of real-life acute stress on cognitive inhibition and response inhi-bition in college students.Methods:Totally 4O interviewees in the National Postgraduate Entrance Examination were recruited and they were asked to complete the Flanker task and Go/Nogo dual-task immediately after the interview(stress condition)and 7 months after the interview(control condition)respectively.The current stress level was as-sessed with the Self-reported Stress Scale and State Anxiety Inventory.Results:The self-reported stress scores(P<0.001),and state anxiety scores(P<0.01)were higher under stress condition than under control condition.In the Flanker task,the reaction time of the incongruent trials was faster under stress condition than under control condi-tion,and the Flanker effect was lower under stress condition than under control condition(Ps<0.05).For the probe stimuli in the Go/Nogo dual task,the reaction time of Nogo-probes and probe Go/Nogo effect was higherunder stress condition than under control condition(Ps<0.05).Conclusion:Acute stress in real life might enhance the cognitive inhibition of distractor but impair the inhibition of incorrect response in college students.
作者 齐铭铭 盖茹 高贺明 QI Mingming;GAI Ru;GAO Heming(School of Psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,Liaoning Province,China)
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第9期814-819,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L22CSH007)。
关键词 现实生活应激 认知抑制 反应抑制 real-life stress cognitive inhibition response inhibition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献35

  • 1岳珍珠,张德玄,王岩.冲突控制的神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):651-660. 被引量:23
  • 2李文利,钱铭怡.状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):108-114. 被引量:215
  • 3王妍,罗跃嘉.大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(4):396-398. 被引量:186
  • 4邓晓红,周晓林,张伯全,崔玉华.强迫症患者反应抑制缺陷及注意的调节作用[J].心理科学,2006,29(5):1203-1205. 被引量:3
  • 5刘平.Beck抑郁问卷.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:191-194.
  • 6Pacak K, Palkovits M. Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders [J]. Endocr Rev, 2001,22(4) : 502 - 548.
  • 7Foley P, Kirschbaum C. Human hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal ax- is responses to acute psychosocial stress in laboratory settings [ J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2010, 35 ( 1 ) : 91 - 96.
  • 8McEwen BS. The brain is the central organ of stress and adaptation [ J]. Neuroimage, 2009, 47 (3) : 911 - 913.
  • 9Wang J, Korczykowski M, Rao H, et al. Gender difference in neural response to psychological stress [ J]. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci, 2007, 2(3) : 227 - 239.
  • 10Wang J, Rao H, Wetmore GS, et al. Perfusion functional MRI re- veals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress [ J]. PNAS, 2005, 102(49) : 17804 - 17809.

共引文献188

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部