期刊文献+

行人-非机动车慢行共享路段交通冲突及服务水平分析

Traffic Conflict and Service Level of Pedestrian and Non Motor Vehicle Slow Sharing Road Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 受红线宽度所限,部分城市道路采用了行人与非机动车共享空间的断面形式。近年来,共享单车、外卖快递发展迅猛,慢行共享空间中行人和非机动车相互影响,交通冲突显著增加。根据深圳市4条行人与非机动车共享路段上交通调查获取的数据,对交通冲突的类型和数量进行统计分析,采用模糊C均值聚类分析方法,提出基于交通冲突数的慢行共享路段服务水平划分方法,得到完整连续的基于冲突数的服务水平划分标准及状态描述表,可为慢行空间的规划设计和管理提供参考。 Limited by the width of the red line,some urban roads adopt the cross-section form of shared space for pedestrians and non motorized vehicles.In recent years,shared bicycles and takeaway express delivery have developed rapidly,the pedestrians and non motor vehicle in the slow-moving shared space interact with each other,and traffic conflicts have increased significantly.Based on the data obtained from traffic surveys on four pedestrian and non motorized vehicle shared lanes in Shenzhen,the types and quantities of traffic conflicts are statistically analyzed.Using the fuzzy C-means clustering analysis method,a service level division method for slow shared lanes based on the number of traffic conflicts is proposed.A complete and continuous service level division standard and state description table based on the number of traffic conflicts are obtained,which can provide reference for the planning,design and management of slow-moving space.
作者 莫一魁 谢侨华 邓雁翎 苏楚欣 蔡嘉浩 MO Yikui;XIE Qiaohua;DENG Yanling;SU Chuxin;CAI Jiahao(School of Civil and Traffic Engineerin,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)
出处 《交通与运输》 2024年第4期14-18,共5页 Traffic & Transportation
基金 国家自然科学基金(51208308)。
关键词 交通冲突 服务水平 模糊均值聚类 慢行共享空间 城市道路 Traffic conflict Service level Fuzzy mean clustering Slow-moving shared space Urban road
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献47

  • 1景春光,王殿海.典型交叉口混合交通冲突分析与处理方法[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):97-100. 被引量:53
  • 2马国忠,明士军,吴海涛.电动自行车安全特性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(4):48-52. 被引量:39
  • 3单晓峰,王炜,王昊,徐上.非拥挤路段自行车交通流特性研究[J].交通与计算机,2006,24(6):41-43. 被引量:8
  • 4南京市建设委员会.2006年南京城市道路交通发展年度报告[R].南京:南京市建设委员会,2007.
  • 5Federal Highway Administration, Evaluation of Safety, Design, and Operation of Shared-Use Paths[R] . Washington D.C.:Final Report, Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-137, 2006.
  • 6Transportation Research Board. 2000 Highway Capacity Manual JR]. Washington D.C. : National Research Council, 2000: 111-121.
  • 7Sisiopiku V P, AkiD n. Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data [J] Transportation Research Part F,2003: 249-274.
  • 8Navin F.P.D.. Bicycle traffic flow characteristics: experimental results and comparisons [J]. ITE Journal, 1994,64(3): 31-36.
  • 9Muraleetharan T., Adachi,T UchidaK. Hagiwara T. et al. A Study on evaluation of pedestrian level of service along sidewalks and at crosswalks using conjoint analysis[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Management, 2004,21(3):727-735.
  • 10Hein Botma et al. Slow traffic using shared facilities [J]. Washington D.C. Transportation Research Board3186,2001: 1-14.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部