期刊文献+

英语二语情绪标签名词与负载名词认知神经模型研究

A Study on Cognitive Neural Model of L2 English Emotion⁃label and Emotion⁃laden Nouns
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究采用情绪归类任务,通过考察英语二语情绪标签名词和负载名词诱发的脑电变化,探究了两类情绪名词的认知神经模型。研究发现:1)两类情绪名词均比中性名词诱发更大的N100;2)积极标签名词比中性名词诱发更大的EEPN和更小的N400,消极标签名词和负载名词比中性名词诱发更大的LEPN;3)积极标签名词和积极负载名词均比中性名词诱发更大的LPC。据此构建了英语二语情绪名词的三阶段加工模型:早期为感知觉加工阶段,情绪表征促进词形识别;中期为情绪和概念意义加工阶段,标签名词的意义通达早于负载名词且受效价调节;晚期为语境整合阶段,两者均受效价调节。 The present study explores the cognitive neural model of L2 English emotion⁃label and emotion⁃laden nouns by examining the changes of their elicited ERPs in an emotion categorization task.Results show that:1)Both emotion⁃label and emotion⁃laden nouns elicite larger N100 than neutral nouns.2)Positive emotion⁃label nouns induce larger EEPN and smaller N400 than neutral nouns,while emotion⁃laden and negative emotion⁃label nouns induce bigger LEPN than neutral nouns.3)Positive emotion⁃label and emotion⁃laden nouns display larger LPC than neutral nouns.Based on these findings,a three⁃stage processing model of L2 emotional nouns is constructed.At the early perceptual processing stage,emotion representation accelerate the morphological recognition of these two types of emotional nouns.At the middle emotional meaning and conceptual meaning processing stage,the semantic access to emotion⁃label nouns occur earlier than that of emotion⁃laden nouns and is modulated by valence.At the late context integration stage,the processings of the two types of emotional nouns are both influenced by valence.
作者 陈士法 顾晓岚 CHEN Shi-fa;GU Xiao-lan
出处 《外语导刊》 北大核心 2024年第4期82-91,160,共11页 Foreign Languages Bimonthly
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“英汉心理词汇表征及计算模型研究”(21BYY114) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(202461093)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1刘绍龙.论二语词汇深度习得及发展特征——关于词义与词缀习得的实证调查[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(6):436-441. 被引量:193
  • 2彭聃龄,胡治国,刘宏艳,刘聪慧,丁国盛.词汇阅读中情绪调节的神经机制[J].科学通报,2006,51(4):420-426. 被引量:9
  • 3孙蓝,赵新红,许秋敏.二语词汇语义习得中的形义映现[J].语言科学,2006,5(4):56-65. 被引量:5
  • 4Dufour,R.& J.Kroll.1995.Matching words to concepts in two languages:A test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation[J].Memory & Cognition 23:166-180.
  • 5Jiang,N.2000.Lexical representation and development in a second language EJ].Applied Linguistics 21:47-77.
  • 6Joe,A.1998.What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition?[J].Applied Linguistics 19:357-377.
  • 7Kroll,J.& A.M.B.De Groot.1997.Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual:Mapping form to meaning in two languages[A].In A.M.B.de Groot & J.F.Kroll(eds.).Tutorials in Bilingualism:Psycholinguistic Perspectives[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.169-199.
  • 8Kutas,M,et al.1980.Reading senseless sentences:Brain potential reflect semantic incongruity[J].Science 207:203-205.
  • 9Kutas,M.& S.Hillyard.1984.Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association[J].Nature 307:161-163.
  • 10Laufer.B.& Z.Goldstein.2004.Testing vocabulary knowledge:Size,strength,and computer adaptiveness[J].Language Learning 54:390-436.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部