网络主播账号纠纷的解决:理论基础与裁判路径

Solution to Network Anchor Account Disputes:Theoretical Basis and Pathway of Judgment

网络主播账号作为互联网经济勃兴时代的新型生产力,相关司法纠纷层出不穷,但我国尚未形成具体的民事法律制度明确其权利性质及归属。由于传统“物债二分”体系下的诸多理论难以妥善化解网络主播账号纠纷的桎梏,故而须加以反思与补正。出于弥合立法缺陷与不损益现有民事权利体系的双重考虑,应当选择“多元权利说”与“关系范式说”为理论基础,实现研究范围与视角的“超越”。网络主播账号极具个性化,不应提前设限其权利性质,而应以包容视角将其认定为物权、债权、人格权等多元权利客体,以网络主播账号“使用权及其收益”为真正争议焦点,其权利归属应在法律允许的范围内遵循当事人约定,必要时以公平与效率为兜底,实现司法审判的实质正义。

The network anchor account,as a novel productive force in the booming era of Internet economy,has an endless stream of related judicial disputes,however,China has not yet formed a dedicated civil legal system to clarify its nature and ownership.As traditional theories under the“property-debt dichotomy”system fail to properly resolve the disputes arising from network anchor accounts,it is imperative to revisit and strive to solve the dilemma.To bridge the legislative gaps and respect the existing civil rights system,we should adopt“multiple rights theory”and“relationship paradigm theory”as the theoretical basis to realize the“transcendence”of the research scope and perspective.Given the highly personalized nature of network anchor accounts,they should not be limited in advance,but should be regarded as multiple rights objects such as real rights,creditor’s rights and personality rights from an inclusive perspective.The“right to use and income”of network anchor accounts should be the real focus of disputes,and the ownership of their rights should primarily be determined by the agreement between the parties within the legal limits.Where necessary,fairness and efficiency should serve as the foundation to ensure substantive justice in judicial proceedings.