期刊文献+

考虑期望强度与属性补偿关系的新能源汽车在线推荐方法

A New Energy Vehicle Online Recommendation Method Considering the Relationship between Aspiration Strength and Attribute Compensation Relationship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于消费者属性期望,结合柔性决策和补偿原则理论,定义期望强度与属性补偿关系,明确属性期望与期望强度融合方法以及产品属性补偿规则,提出考虑期望强度和属性补偿关系的新能源汽车在线筛选方法。结合证据理论与消费者风险偏好提出新能源汽车在线排序方法,实现在线推荐满足消费者期望的新能源汽车。研究发现:与考虑属性期望严格约束的推荐方法相比,同时考虑期望强度与属性补偿关系能够避免综合高性价比车型因部分消费者属性期望严格约束而被忽略;采用证据推理结合消费者风险偏好确定车型优先级,能够更加精准地为消费者推荐满足个性化期望的新能源汽车。 Based on consumers' attribute aspiration,this study combines flexible decision and theory of compensation principle,defines aspiration strength and attribute compensation relationship,clarifies the method of integrating attribute aspiration and aspiration strength,the rules of product attribute compensation,and proposes the online selection method of new energy vehicles considering aspiration strength and attribute compensation relationship.Combining the evidence theory and consumer risk preference,we propose an online ranking method,and realize the online recommendation of vehicles that satisfy aspiration for consumers.The results show that:Compared with the recommendation method that considers the strictly attribute aspiration,the method that considers both aspiration strength and attribute compensation relationship,can avoid the comprehensive cost-effective models being ignored due to the strictly attribute aspiration.Adopting evidential reasoning combined with consumers' risk preferences to determine model priorities can more accurately recommend new energy vehicles that satisfy personalized aspiration for consumers.
作者 徐畅 赵萌 孟鑫宇 赵鑫淼 XU Chang;ZHAO Meng;MENG Xinyu;ZHAO Xinmiao(Northeastern University,Shenyang,China;Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao,Qinhuangdao,Hebei,China)
出处 《管理学报》 北大核心 2024年第7期1056-1066,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(72371066,71971051) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(22YJA630119)。
关键词 期望强度 属性补偿关系 新能源汽车在线推荐方法 概率语言术语集 证据理论 aspiration strength attribute compensation relationship online recommendation for new energy vehicles probabilistic linguistic term sets(PLTSs) evidence theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献78

  • 1苏屹,曹铮.新能源汽车协同创新网络结构及影响因素研究[J].科学学研究,2022,40(6):1128-1142. 被引量:17
  • 2张龙.知识网络结构及其对知识管理的启示[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(2):86-91. 被引量:14
  • 3Dyer J S, Fishburn P C, Steuer R E, et al. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(5): 645-654.
  • 4Stewart T J. A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice[J]. Omega, 1992, 20(5/6): 569-586.
  • 5Zadeh L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I[J]. Information Science, 1975, 8(3): 199-249.
  • 6Carrasco R A, Villar E Hornos M J. A linguistic multi- criteria decision making model applied to hotel service quality evaluation from web data sources[J]. Int J of Intelligerit Systems, 2012, 27(7): 704-731.
  • 7Rodrfguez R M, Martfnez L, Herrera E A multi-criteria linguistic decision making model dealing with comparative terms[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 2012: 229-241.
  • 8Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(6): 529-539.
  • 9Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2002, 138(2): 229-246.
  • 10Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods [J]. Theory and Decision, 1991, 31( 1): 49- 73.

共引文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部