期刊文献+

基于墩柱增设的独柱墩曲线箱梁桥抗倾覆研究

Research on anti-overturning of curved box girder bridge with single column pier based on the addition of piers and columns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,独柱墩曲线箱梁桥整体侧翻倾覆事故时有发生,开展抗倾覆分析及加固对策的研究具有重要的工程价值。以某匝道桥为工程背景,考虑其抗倾覆稳定性,使用支座失效法并结合有限元分析软件Midas/Civil建立柔性梁格有限元模型,对独柱墩曲线箱梁桥加固前后的抗倾覆稳定性和动力特性进行了对比分析。研究结果表明:加固前该桥曲线箱梁的一阶振型为扭转振动,在4号墩处,易发生扭转,可能导致支座脱空,此时该桥抗倾覆稳定系数最小为1.97,不满足规范中抗倾覆稳定系数不小于2.50的要求。采用墩柱增设法对4号墩进行加固后,该桥曲线箱梁的一阶振型为纵向弯曲振动,抗倾覆稳定系数最小为4.31,抗倾覆能力得到显著提升。通过现场抗倾覆稳定性静载试验,对加固效果进行了实桥验证,效果较好。 In recent years,overturning accidents involving curved girder bridges with single-column piers have occurred frequently,underscoring the critical engineering significance of conducting antioverturning analysis and developing effective reinforcement strategies.This study focused on a specific ramp bridge,evaluating its anti-overturning stability by using the bearing failure method and finite element analysis software Midas/Civil.A flexible girder lattice finite element model was established to compare and analyze the anti-overturning stability and dynamic characteristics of the curved girder bridge before and after reinforcement.The results indicate that,prior to reinforcement,the first-order mode of the curved box girder of the ramp bridge exhibited torsional vibration,particularly prone to torsion at pier 4,potentially leading to bearing voids.The minimum anti-overturning stability coefficient was found to be 1.97,failing to meet the required minimum of 2.50,thus indicating insufficient anti-overturning capacity.Post-reinforcement,with the application of additional piers and columns to pier 4,the first-order mode of the curved box girder shifted to longitudinal bending vibration,and the minimum anti-overturning stability coefficient increased to 4.31,demonstrating a significant enhancement in anti-overturning capacity.The efficacy of the reinforcement was further validated through an on-site static load test,which confirmed the positive impact of the implemented measures.
作者 吕毅刚 王翠 饶攀 韩伟威 李星 乔杰 LYU Yigang;WANG Cui;RAO Pan;HAN Weiwei;LI Xing;QIAO Jie(School of Civil Engineering,Changsha University of Science&Technology,Changsha 410114,China;School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,Changsha University of Science&Technology,Changsha 410114,China;Hunan Province Engineering Laboratory for Bridge Structure Safety Control,Changsha University of Science&Technology,Changsha 410114,China;Far East Facade(Zhuhai)Co.,Ltd.,Zhuhai 519090,China)
出处 《交通科学与工程》 2024年第4期85-92,共8页 Journal of Transport Science and Engineering
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究一般项目(20C0063) 湖南省教育厅科学研究创新平台开放基金项目(20K005) 长沙理工大学桥梁结构安全控制湖南省工程实验室开放基金资助项目(14KD13)。
关键词 独柱墩 曲线箱梁桥 墩柱增设法 抗倾覆稳定系数 single column pier curved box girder bridge application of additional piers and columns anti-overturning stability factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1周列茅.独柱支墩连续箱梁桥的倾覆事故成因分析[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2011,7(7):179-181. 被引量:15
  • 2周子杰,阮欣,石雪飞.梁桥横向稳定验算中倾覆轴的选取[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(5):907-910. 被引量:18
  • 3JTGD62-20xx,公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范(征求意见稿)[S].
  • 4浙公路E2009]102号,桥梁上部结构抗倾覆验算荷载的规定[S].
  • 5徐洪涛,郭国忠,蒲焕玲,苑敏.我国近年来桥梁事故发生的原因与教训[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(11):90-95. 被引量:61
  • 6尹深.哈尔滨阳明滩大桥引桥坍塌一周年塌桥事故频发处理各异[EB/OL]. http://society, people,com. cn/n/2013/0824/cl008-22682256. html.
  • 7HARIK I E,SHAABAN A M,GESUND H,etal. United States bridge failures, 1951-1988 [J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.1990(4):272-277.
  • 8WARDHANA K,FABIAN C. Hadipriono. analy-sis of recent bridge failures in the United States[J],Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.2003,17:144-150.
  • 9BIEZMA M V, SCHANACK F. Collapse of steelbridges[J3. Journal of Performance of ConstructedFacilities. 2007,21 : 398-405.
  • 10Edgar E. Munoz Diaz,Federico Nunez Moreno,Jamshid Mohammadi. Investigation of CommonCauses of Bridge Collapse in Colombia[J]. PracticePeriodical on Structural Design and Construction.2009,14:194-200.

共引文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部