期刊文献+

基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建医院药师人文关怀能力的指标体系

Constructing an index system of humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists based upon Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:构建医院药师人文关怀能力的指标体系,提高药师的人文关怀能力和药学服务水平,加强医疗服务的人文关怀,构建和谐的医患关系。方法:基于Watson关怀理论,运用德尔菲法和文献分析法构建医院药师人文关怀能力的指标体系,利用层次分析法计算各级指标权重,采用调查问卷法进行指标体系的信效度分析。结果:本研究共遴选药学专家25名,平均年龄为(39.44±5.60)岁,平均工作年限为(15.36±7.35)年。函询专家的熟悉系数为0.724,判断系数为0.880,权威系数为0.802。各级指标的肯德尔系数均在0.340~0.671,χ^(2)检验P值均<0.05,具有统计学意义。经过两轮德尔菲专家函询后,最终确定医院药师人文关怀能力的指标体系,包括一级指标5个,二级指标24个;利用层次分析法确定各指标的权重;问卷调查法检测指标体系具有良好的信效度。结论:该研究构建的医院药师人文关怀能力指标体系具有较好的科学性和权威性,能够为医院药师人文关怀能力和医疗服务质量的提升及相关政策的制定提供参考依据。 OBJECTIVE To construct an index system of humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists,improve humanistic care capability and pharmaceutical service levels of hospital pharmacists,strengthen humanistic cares of medical services and foster a harmonious physician-patient relationship.METHODS Based upon Watson’s caring theory,Delphi method and literature analysis were utilized for constructing an index system of humanistic caring capability of hospital pharmacists.Analytic hierarchy process was utilized for calculating the weights of parameters at all levels.And questionnaire method was employed for evaluating the reliability and validity of the index system.SPSS 26.0 and Excel 2013 were utilized for statistical analysis of each quantitative index.Cronbach’s α coefficient was adopted for evaluating the reliability of the index system and P<0.05 denoted statistical significance.RESULTS A total of 25 pharmaceutical experts were selected with an average age of(39.44±5.60)year and an average practicing career of(15.36±7.35)year.All experts had a professional title of pharmacist-in-charge or above and bachelor degree or above.Motivation coefficient(C_(j))was represented by recovery rate of expert consultation questionnaire.Two rounds of letter inquiries were both 100%,indicating that experts had a high motivation.The familiarity degree of expert was 0.724 with a judgment coefficient of 0.880 and an authority coefficient of 0.802.Kendall coordination coefficients of all indices ranged from 0.340 to 0.671 and P values of Chi-square test were all statistically significant(P<0.05).After two rounds of expert correspondence consultation,index system of humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists was finally determined,including 5 first-level and 24 second-level parameters.The weights of each index were determined by analytic hierarchy process.The index system demonstrated excellent reliability and validity by questionnaire method.CONCLUSION The index system of humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists established here is both scientific and authoritative,providing references for optimizing humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists.It may further improve the qualities of pharmaceutical care,enhance medical experiences and boost patient satisfactions at medical institutions.
作者 关克磊 王彦芳 史香芬 陈晓莉 孟艳莎 覃红云 杜书章 GUAN Kelei;WANG Yanfang;SHI Xiangfen;CHEN Xiaoli;MENG Yansha;QIN Honyun;DU Shuzhang(Department of Pharmacy,First Affliated Hospital,Zhengzhou University,Henan Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第15期1801-1805,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 医院药师 人文关怀能力 德尔菲法 指标体系 层次分析法 hospital pharmacists humanistic care capability index system Delphi method analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献94

  • 1任文,李婷,陈俊春,任菁菁.临床医学硕士专业学位研究生医患沟通的认知及培养需求研究[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2022,6(1):74-77. 被引量:10
  • 2吴育华,诸为,李新全,高荣.区间层次分析法──IAHP[J].天津大学学报,1995,28(5):700-705. 被引量:107
  • 3蔡雄.新形势下建立和谐医患关系的实践和思考[J].现代医院管理,2007,5(2):11-13. 被引量:9
  • 4Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 5Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 6Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 7Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 8Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 9Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 10Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.

共引文献1763

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部