期刊文献+

考虑应急保障的危化品道路运输多目标路径优化方法

On Multi-objective Path Optimization Method for Hazardous Chemical Road Transportation Considering Emergency Support
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为进一步提高危化品道路运输路径优化的合理性,将事故应急保障引入路径优化中.分析应急保障对路径选择的影响及其确定方法,并把应急保障水平引入风险目标函数中作为补偿系数;在此基础上,构建运输风险最小、运输时间最短、运输成本最低的危化品道路运输多目标路径选择模型,然后应用遗传模拟退火算法进行求解.结果表明:该模型能更加合理科学地选择危化品运输路径,满足运输企业对路径安全性以及经济利益的要求. To further improve the rationality of optimizing the road transportation path for hazardous chemicals,accident emergency support is introduced into the path optimization.It analyzes the impact of emergency support on path selection and its determination methods,and introduces the level of emergency support into the risk objective function as a compensation coefficient.Based on this,a multi-objective path selection model for hazardous chemical road transportation with the minimum transportation risk,shortest transportation time,and lowest transportation cost is constructed,and then using genetic simulated annealing(GSA)to solve it.The calculation example shows that the model can more reasonably and scientifically select the transportation path of hazardous chemicals,meeting the requirements of transportation enterprises for path safety and economic benefits.
作者 刘灿 周荣义 石云霄 杨璧帆 姜子健 LIU Can;ZHOU Rongyi;SHI Yunxiao;YANG Bifan;JIANG Zijian(School of Resources,Environment and Safety Engineering,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201,China;Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques of Coal Mines,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201,China)
出处 《矿业工程研究》 2024年第2期49-54,共6页 Mineral Engineering Research
基金 湖南省教育厅重点资助项目(20A192) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52074118)。
关键词 危化品运输 多目标 应急保障 遗传模拟退火 transportation of hazardous chemicals multiple objectives emergency support level genetic simulated annealing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1毕军,王华东.有害废物运输环境风险研究[J].中国环境科学,1995,15(4):241-246. 被引量:29
  • 2刘海霞,徐明,唐璐.高速公路危险品运输环境风险评价及防护应急对策[J].安全与环境工程,2006,13(2):87-90. 被引量:15
  • 3Chakraborty J, Armstrong M P. Using geographic plume analysis to assess community vulnerability to hazardous accidents [J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1995, 19(5,6) : 341-356.
  • 4Drezner A, Weslowsky G O. Location of obnoxious mute[J]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 1989, 40( 11 ) : 1011-1018.
  • 5Miaou S P, Chin S M. Computing k-shortest path for spent nuclear fuel highway transportation[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, 53: 64-80.
  • 6List G F. Modeling and analysis for hazardous materials transportation: Risk analysis, routing/scheduling and facility location[J]. Transportation Science, 1991, 25(2): 100-114.
  • 7Current J. A model to assess risk, equity and efficiency in facility location and transportation of hazardous materials [ J ]. Location Science, 1995, 3(3): 187-201.
  • 8Karkazis J, Boffey T B. Optimal Location of routes for vehicles transporting hazardous materials [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 86: 201-215.
  • 9Giannikos I. A multl-objective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 104: 333-342.
  • 10Erkut E. On the credibility of the conditional risk model for routing hazardous materials [ J ]. Operations Research Letters, 1995, 18: 49-52.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部