期刊文献+

引入公平性信息的卫生经济性评价方法与研究进展

Research progress of equity-informative health economic evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的卫生经济性评价主要侧重于“效率(efficiency)”最大化,对“公平(equity)”因素的定量考量较为不足。为在传统经济性评价的基础上进一步定量评价不同公平性因素,引入公平性信息的经济性评价方法体系逐渐发展起来。本文梳理总结了5种将公平性考量纳入经济性评价的方法,其中对应用比较广泛的公平加权法、分布式成本-效果分析和扩展成本-效果分析3种方法进行了详细介绍,包括基本理念、数据需求、优缺点等。引入公平性信息的经济性评价方法将为决策者定量权衡医疗资源配置的“效率最大化”和“分配公平”提供有效工具,在我国具有较好的发展前景,但缺乏相关基础数据是当前限制此类方法实践应用的主要挑战之一,也是未来相关领域研究者需要突破的研究壁垒。 Traditional health economic evaluation mainly focuses on efficiency and lacks quantitative consideration of equity.To further quantify different equity factors based on traditional economic evaluation,equity-informative economic evaluations have been gradually developed.This paper reviews and summarizes 5 methods to incorporate equity into economic evaluations,among which the 3 widely used including equity-based weighting(EBW),distributional cost-effectiveness analysis(DCEA),and extended cost-effectiveness analysis(ECEA)are introduced in detail regarding basic concept,data requirements,advantages and disadvantages.The equity-informative economic evaluations will provide an effective tool for decision-makers to trade off between the efficiency maximization and distributional equity in the allocation of health resources formally and transparently,and will have a good prospect in China.However,the lack of relevant basic data is one of the main challenges limiting the practical application of such methods.It is also a research barrier that future researchers in related fields need to break through.
作者 方楠 贺小宁 吴晶 FANG Nan;HE Xiaoning;WU Jing(School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology,Faculty of Medicine,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;Center for Social Science Survey and Data,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2024年第8期929-937,共9页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(72174142) 天津市自然科学基金青年项目(21JCQNJC00660)。
关键词 经济性评价 公平性 公平加权法 分布式成本-效果分析 扩展成本-效果分析 Economic evaluation Equity Equity-based weighting Distributional cost-effectiveness Extended cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1汪毅霖,张宁.不平等厌恶的测度与收入不平等调整的人类发展指数——基于阿特金森社会福利函数的研究[J].数量经济研究,2021,12(2):115-133. 被引量:5
  • 2Braveman P. Health disparities and health eq- uity: concepts and measurement [J]. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 2006, 27: 167-194.
  • 3Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, et al. Taekling the challenges to health equity in China [J]. The Lancet, 2008, 372: 1493-1501.
  • 4Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health [J]. International journal of health services, 1992, 22(3): 429-445.
  • 5Culyer A J, Newhouse J P. Handbook of Health Economics [M]. New York: Elsevier, 2000.
  • 6世界卫生组织组织法第四十五版(补编)[Z].2006.
  • 7World Health Organization. Equity in health and health care: a WHO /SIDA initiative [Z]. WHO, Geneva, 1995 (1).
  • 8WHO. Constitution of World Health Organiza- tion In Basic documents [Z].38th edition including a- mendments adopted up to 31 October 1990 Geneva.
  • 9联合国发展署.2010年人类发展报告-国家真正财富:人类发展进程[EB/OL].http://www.an.ors/ztddevelopment/hdr/2010.
  • 10Wagstaff A. Measuring equity in health care fi- nancing: Reflections on and alternatives to the World Health Organization's Fairness of Financing Index [M]. World Bank Publications, 2001.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部