期刊文献+

人际类关系名词的语义及其词典释义

Semantic Analysis and Dictionary Interpretation of Interpersonal Relationship Nouns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人际类关系名词不同于普通名词,其语义不自足,在句子中要求有领属定语共现。根据语义类型、句法特征等,人际类关系名词可分为单向关系名词和双向关系名词;结合《现代汉语词典》中的释义分析,可进一步归纳为直接单向关系名词、间接单向关系名词、交互型双向关系名词、加合型双向关系名词四种释义模式。对《现代汉语词典》已收录的“孩子、恩人、上家、家属、同事、恋人”等关系名词词条提出的修改意见,说明《现代汉语词典》的编纂需要在词义理论发展的基础上不断修改完善。 Interpersonal relationship nouns are different from ordinary nouns,whose semantics are not self-sufficient and require the co-occurrence of the possessive attribute in the sentence.This arti⁃cle divides them into unidirectional and bidirectional relational nouns based on the semantic types and syntactic features,while combines examples from Modern Chinese Dictionary to analyze and summarize four interpretation modes:direct unidirectional relational nouns,indirect unidirectional relational nouns,interactive bidirectional relational nouns,and additive bidirectional relational nouns.Finally,the article puts forward the modification and supplement of relational noun terms in the dictionary such as"chil⁃dren,benefactors,family members,colleagues,and lovers"indicating that the definition of modern Chi⁃nese dictionary is becoming more perfect in the process of revision with the development of lexical the⁃ory.
作者 高翀 Gao Chong(School of Humanities,Taizhou University,Linhai 317000,China)
出处 《台州学院学报》 2024年第4期47-54,共8页 Journal of Taizhou University
关键词 人际类关系名词 语义分析 单向关系 双向关系 词典释义 interpersonal relationship nouns semantic analysis unidirectional relationship bidirec⁃tional relationship interpretive mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1胡明晓.基于亲属元的亲属运算模型研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2007,28(12):2785-2787. 被引量:4
  • 2石安石.1998.《语义研究》.语文出版社.
  • 3陈振宇,袁毓林,张秀松,周强.2009a.《一种基于大知识库的亲属关系自动推理模型》,待刊.
  • 4高嵩.2008.《亲属关系自动推理》,清华大学研究报告.
  • 5Leech, Geoffrey 1974 Semantics, Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • 6霍恩比(A.S.Hornby)(2009)《牛津高阶英汉双解词典》,王玉章译,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 7钱大听(1915)《恒言录》(第三卷),北京:古籍期刊社.
  • 8张秀松,袁毓林,陈振宇,周强.(2010)汉语亲属关系的语义表达和句法实现,《语言学论丛》第42辑,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 9Chen, T. S. & J. K. Shryock (1932) Chinese relationship terms. American Anthropologist 34, 623 -669.
  • 10Feng, H. Y. (1936) Teknonymy as a Formative Factor in the Chinese Kinship System. American Anthropologist 38, 59 - 66.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部