急性主动脉夹层患者围术期疼痛评估和管理的最佳证据总结

Summary of best evidence for assessment and management of pain in perioperative patients with acute aortic dissection

目的 系统检索、评价及汇总急性主动脉夹层围术期疼痛评估和管理相关的证据,为临床实践提供参考。方法 基于PIPOST模式确定循证问题,按照“6S”金字塔模型,系统检索Up To Date,JBI循证卫生保健中心数据库,BMJ Best Practice,国际实践指南注册与透明化平台,国际指南图书馆(Guidelines International Network,GIN),美国指南网(National Guideline Clearinghouse,NGC),英国国家临床医学研究所指南网所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,NICE),苏格兰院际间指南网(Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,SIGN),新西兰指南协作网(New Zealand Guidelines Group,NZGG),加拿大安大略省注册护士协会(Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario,RNAO),澳大利亚临床实践指南数据库(Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines,ACPG),美国心脏协会(American Heart Association,AHA),欧洲心脏病学会(European Society of Cardiology,ESC),中国循证医学中心,中国医脉通指南网,Cochrane Library,PubMed,中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed),中国知网,万方数据库及维普数据库中关于急性主动脉夹层围术期疼痛评估和管理相关的文献。由课题组接受过循证培训的研究人员对文献进行质量评价,并对符合质量标准的文献进行证据提取。结果 共纳入17篇文献,其中指南5篇、专家共识3篇、系统评价6篇、随机对照试验研究3篇。总结出29条关于急性主动脉夹层患者围术期疼痛评估和管理的最佳证据,包括疼痛评估、疼痛管理基本原则、疼痛管理的药物干预策略、疼痛管理的非药物干预策略、疼痛评价、疼痛管理教育培训、疼痛管理的组织7个方面。结论本研究提取和汇总的有关急性主动脉夹层围术期疼痛评估和管理的证据,可为医护人员临床实践提供参考和指导。

Objective To systematically retrieve,evaluate and integrate evidences about the assessment and management of perioperative pain in patients with acute aortic dissection.Methods PIPOST model was used to identify themes of assessment and management of perioperative pain.The literatures in the themes was systematically searched through the databases of UpToDate,JBI,BMJ Best Practice,practice guide REgistration for trans RAREncy(PREPARE),Guidelines International Network(GIN),National Guideline Clearinghouse(NGC),National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE),Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network(SIGN),New Zealand Guidelines Group(NZGG),Registered Nurses’Association of Ontario(RNAO),Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines(ACPG),American Heart Association(AHA),European Society of Cardiology(ESC),the Chinese Cochrane Center,Medlive,Cochrane library,PubMed,SinoMed,CNKI,Wangfan Data,and VIP.The retrieved literatures were evaluated and the evidences that met the inclusive criteria were extracted from the literatures by researchers who had trained for evidence-based study.Results A total of 17 studies,including 5 guidelines,3 expert consensus,6 systematic reviews and 3 randomised controlled trials were included in this study.Totally,29 pieces of best evidence were extracted in the assessment and management of pain in perioperative patients with acute aortic dissection,including pain assessment,basic principles of pain management,medication intervention strategies of pain management,nonmedication intervention strategies of pain management,pain evaluation,education of pain management and organising pain management.Conclusion Evidences in assessment and management of pain in perioperative patients with acute aortic dissection can provide references and guidance for clinical practice.