呼吸机不同通气模式治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果评价

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Ventilation Modes of Ventilator in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome(NRDS)

目的:分析呼吸机两种通气模式用于新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果。方法:2021年6月~2023年6月收治新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿92例,结合随机数字表法分成对照组(经鼻持续气道正压通气)和观察组(经鼻间歇正压通气)各46例,对比两组疗效、临床指标、血气指标及并发症情况。结果:观察组总有效率高于对照组,给氧、机械通气、临床症状缓解及住院时间均短于对照组,并发症少于对照组,治疗后血气指标优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:经鼻间歇正压通气用于新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿较经鼻持续气道正压通气效果更佳,能缩短治疗时间,更快缓解症状,促进病情恢复,改善血气指标,减少并发症出现。

Objective:To analyze the effect of two ventilation modes of ventilator for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS).Methods:From June 2021 to June 2023,92 children with NRDS were admitted.They were randomly divided into a control group(NCPAP)and an observation group(NIPPV)using a random number table method,with 46 cases in each group.The efficacy,clinical indicators,blood gas indicators,and complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,oxygen administration,mechanical ventilation,clinical symptom relief and hospitalization time were shorter than that of the control group,complications were less than that of the control group,and the blood gas indexes were better than that of the control group after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion:NIPPV is more effective than NCPAP in children with ARDS,shortening treatment time,relieving symptoms faster,promoting recovery,improving blood gas indexes,and reducing complications.