期刊文献+

缓和照护护理模式在肠癌终末期患者中的应用效果

Effect of palliative care nursing model in end-stage patients with colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨缓和照护护理模式在肠癌终末期患者中的应用效果。方法选取南京医科大学附属苏州医院(苏州市立医院)在2019年10月至2022年10月血液肿瘤科收治的肠癌患者180例,以随机数字表法将其分至对照组和观察组各90例。对照组实施常规护理模式,观察组实施缓和照护护理模式。对比两组患者的总体幸福感和生存质量。结果干预前,两组患者总体幸福感量表(General Well-Being Schedule,GWS)及中文版癌症患者生命质量测定量表[The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer(V3.0),EORTC QLQ-C30]评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后,观察组患者GWS及EORTC QLQ-C30评分显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论缓和照护护理模式在提高肠癌终末期患者总体幸福感和强化生存质量方面效果较好。 ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of palliative care nursing model in end-stage patients with colorectal cancer.MethodsA total of 180 patients with colorectal cancer admitted to the department of hematology and oncology of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University(Suzhou Municipal Hospital)from October 2019 to October 2022 were selected and divided into control group and observation group by random number table method,with 90 cases in each group.The control group was given routine nursing mode,while the observation group was given palliative care nursing mode.The general well-being and quality of life were compared between the two groups.ResultsBefore intervention,there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of(General Well-Being Schedule,GWS)and[The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer(V3.0),EORTC QLQ-C30]between the two groups(P>0.05).After intervention,the GWS and EORTC QLQ-C30 scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionsThe palliative care nursing model has a good effect on improving the general well-being and strengthening the quality of life of patients with end-stage intestinal cancer.
作者 姜红妹 王雨 干莉莉 Jiang Hongmei;Wang Yu;Gan Lili(Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University(Suzhou Municipal Hospital),Suzhou 215000,China)
出处 《国际护理学杂志》 2024年第16期2964-2968,共5页 international journal of nursing
基金 江苏省卫生健康委医学科研项目(M2020013)。
关键词 肠癌 终末期 缓和照护 幸福感 生存质量 Colorectal cancer End-stage Palliative care Happiness Quality of Life
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献126

  • 1段建华.主观幸福感概述[J].心理科学进展,1996,6(1):46-51. 被引量:369
  • 2Yaeger R,Cercek A,Chou JF.BRAF突变提示转移性结直肠癌患者转移灶切除术后预后不良[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2014,3(2):32-32. 被引量:13
  • 3汪全海,姚应水,金岳龙,艾东,王金权,余结根,王俊,贺连平.农村女性老年人主观幸福感及其影响因素[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):203-204. 被引量:7
  • 4赵海燕,卢愿清,蒋鸣,张柳柳.肿瘤患者总体幸福感影响因素研究[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(5):29-30. 被引量:10
  • 5王燕.国内外主观幸福感的研究进展[J].科学对社会的影响,2007,51(2):9-12. 被引量:24
  • 6Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 : a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nail Cancer Inst, 1993,85 : 365-376.
  • 7Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, et al. The EORTC modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology. Int J Ment Health, 1994,23:75-96.
  • 8Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin and fluoroumcil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin znd methotrexate in advanced esophago gastric cancer . J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15:261-267.
  • 9Chie WC, Chang KJ, Huang CS, Kuo WH. Quality of life of breast cancer patients in Taiwan validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23. Psychooncology, 2003, 12 ( 7 ) :729-735.
  • 10Bamias A, Hill ME, Cunningham D, et al. Epia-ubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouacil for esophagogastic ademocacinoma: response. Toxicity Quality of life And survival . Cancer, 1996,77 : 1978.

共引文献427

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部