期刊文献+

基于云模型的沈阳城市体检社会满意度研究

Research on Social Satisfaction of Urban PhysicalExamination in Shenyang Based on Cloud Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以沈阳市为例构建了包含8个维度的城市体检社会满意度评价指标体系。通过AHP-CRITIC组合赋权法和云模型理论,分析了沈阳市及其各区的社会满意度,并运用MATLAB软件绘制了社会满意度水平的云图。结果显示:沈阳市及其各区的社会满意度整体水平不高,处于“基本满意”与“比较满意”区间,说明了沈阳市的社会满意度还有较大的提升空间。依据社会满意度的得分情况将沈阳市的9个区划分成A、B、C这3个区域,总结分析了8个维度的得分情况,得出了需要特别关注创新活力、安全韧性、健康舒适这3个维度下的二级指标,最后基于研究结果提出了针对性的改进建议,为提高其他城市的城市体检社会满意度和实现城市的高质量发展提供借鉴。 Taking Shenyang as an example,an evaluation index system of social satisfaction for urban physical examination including eight dimensions is constructed.By using the AHP-CRITIC combined weighting method and cloud model theory,this paper analyzes the social satisfaction of Shenyang and its districts,and uses MATLAB software to plot the social satisfaction level on the cloud map.The results show that the overall level of social satisfaction in Shenyang and its districts is not high,which is between"basically satisfied"and"relatively satisfied",indicating that there is still a lot of room for improvement in social satisfaction in Shenyang.According to the social satisfaction score,the nine districts of Shenyang are divided into three areas:A,B and C.By summarizing and analyzing the scores of eight dimensions,it is concluded that it needs to pay special attention to the secondary indicators under the three dimensions of innovation vitality,safety and toughness,and health and comfort.Finally,based on the research results,this paper puts forward the targeted improvement suggestions,providing reference to improve social satisfaction and high-quality of urban development for other cities in China.
作者 王盼盼 夏雨婷 程光大 WANG Panpan;XIA Yuting;CHENG Guangda(School of Management,Shenyang Jianzhu University,Shenyang 110168,China;Shenyang Planning and Design Institute Co.,LTD.,Shenyang 110002,China)
出处 《沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024年第4期400-406,共7页 Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Social Science
基金 辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托课题(20221s1qnrcwtkt-47)。
关键词 城市体检 社会满意度 组合赋权 云模型 urban physical examination social satisfaction combined empowerment cloud model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献81

  • 1张志鹏,董冠鹏,王相彪,韩叶青,赵宏波.基于多尺度统计模型的居民主观幸福感差异研究——以郑州市为例[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,53(4):379-391. 被引量:1
  • 2Krosnick J. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991, 5: 213-36.
  • 3Healey P. Collaborative Planning[M]. London, Macmillan, 1997.
  • 4Davoudi S. Towards a conceptual Framework for evaluating Governance Capacities in European polycentrie Urban Regions, in D Miller and D Patassini(eds), Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis. Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005,pp:277-294.
  • 5Cook T P. Postpositivist Critical Multiplism, in R L Shortland and M M Mark(eds),Social Science and Social Policy, Newbury Park,CA,Sage, 1985: 129-146.
  • 6Bobrow D B and Dryzek J S.Poliey Analysis by Design[M]. Pittsburgh,PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987.
  • 7Alexander ER. Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a PostPostmodernist Perspective[J]. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 2000,19: 242-256.
  • 8Lichfield D.Community Impact Assessment and Planning. The Role of Objectives in Evaluation Design,in H.Voogd(ed), Recent Developments in Evaluation, Groningen Geo Press, 2001:153-74.
  • 9Faludi A. Korthals ARes W. Evaluation Communicative Planning[A]. in D Borri,A Khakee and c Laeirignola(eds),Evaluating Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning,Dordrencht[C], Kluwer: 1997.
  • 10Miller D and Patassini D introduction-Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation, in D Miller and D patassini(eds),Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis, Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation,Aldershot, Ashgate,2005:1-12.

共引文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部