期刊文献+

证据方法视阈下大数据证据诉讼应用及正当程序保障

Application and Due Process Protection of Big Data Evidence Litigation from the Perspective of Evidence Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据方法的作用在于通过从客观上揭示证据内含的信息内容,联接证据与刑事证明。大数据证据表现出独特的建构性与质素多样性特征,使得现有证据的证据方法无所适从,需要依托融合性证据方法为其诉讼应用提供可操作性指引。而在刑事诉讼中运用融合性证据方法,可能对现有诉讼构造构成挑战。对此,可以从证据方法的工具与程序二维属性出发,建构正当程序保障:在工具属性维度,发挥法官庭外调查的能动、兜底性作用;在程序属性维度,构造“对等”性权利保障,弱化微观权力。 The function of evidence method is to link evidence and criminal proof by objectively revealing the information content contained in evidence.Big data evidence shows unique characteristics of construction and quality diversity,which makes the existing evidence methods at a loss,and it is necessary to rely on the fusion evidence method to provide operational guidance for its litigation application.However,the application of fusion evidence in criminal proceedings may pose a challenge to the existing litigation structure.In this regard,due process protection can be constructed from the two-dimensional attributes of tools and procedures of evidential methods:In the dimension of tool attributes,the role of the judge’s out-of-court investigation can be played.In the dimension of program attribute,we construct“equal”rights protection and weaken micro-power.
作者 倪春乐 陈博文 NI Chunle;CHEN Bowen(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《北京警察学院学报》 2024年第4期24-33,共10页 Journal of Beijing Police College
基金 重庆市高校创新研究群体项目“证据科技创新与应用”(项目编号:CXQT21033) 重庆市科学技术局2022年度技术创新与应用发展重点项目“电信网络诈骗犯罪侦防关键技术研究”(项目编号:CSTB2022TIAD-KPX0107)。
关键词 证据方法 大数据证据 融合性证据方法 正当程序 权利保障 evidence method big data evidence fusion evidence method due process rights protection
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部