多学科协作护理在压缩性骨折患者中的应用效果

Application effects of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing in patients with compression fracture

目的:观察多学科协作护理在压缩性骨折患者中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年7月至2022年9月该院收治的114例压缩性骨折患者的临床资料,依据护理方法不同将其分为研究组和对照组各57例。对照组采用常规护理,研究组采用多学科协作护理,比较两组护理前后疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、负性情绪[抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)]评分和护理满意度。结果:护理后,研究组VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理1周后,研究组SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组护理满意度为94.74%(54/57),高于对照组的80.70%(46/57),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:多学科协作护理应用于压缩性骨折患者可提高护理满意度,降低疼痛程度和负性情绪评分,效果优于常规护理。

Objective:To observe application effects of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing in patients with compression fracture.Methods:The clinical data of 114 patients with compression fractures admitted to this hospital from July 2021 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different nursing methods,they were divided into study group and control group,57 cases in each group.The control group was given routine nursing,while the study group was given the multidisciplinary collaborative nursing.The pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]score,the negative emotion[self-rating depression scale(SDS),self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)]score before and after the nursing,and the nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results:After the nursing,the VAS score of the study group was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 1 week of nursing,the scores of SAS and SDS in the study group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the nursing satisfaction of the study group was 94.74%(54/57),which was higher than 80.70%(46/57)of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The multidisciplinary collaborative nursing in the patients with compression fracture can improve the nursing satisfaction and reduce the pain degree and the negative emotion scores.Moreover,it is superior to the routine nursing.