中国目录学史研究述评

Review of Research on the History of Chinese Bibliography

学术史建立是学科发展成熟的标志。目录学作为我国传统学问之一,对其学术史的梳理一直是学界关注的重点。中国目录学史已有研究的贡献聚焦于三个领域:中国目录学通史研究、中国目录学断代史研究和中国目录学家及学术流派研究。通过梳理分析发现,一方面,前人对中国目录学史研究尚存不足,包括:通史研究详古略今,断代史研究尚有缺疏,目录学家个体研究有待深耕;另一方面,学术年表等学术史基础资料建设函待加强。

The establishment of academic history is a symbol of the maturity of disciplinary development.History of Chinese bibliography has always been a focus of academic attention.The contribution of the existing research focuses on three major aspects:general history of Chinese bibliography,chronological history of Chinese bibliography,Chinese bibliographers and academic schools.Through sorting and analysis,it is found that on the one hand,previous research on the history of Chinese bibliography still have shortcomings,including:a detailed ancient study and omitted modern study of the general history of Chinese bibliography,a lack of research on the chronological history of Chinese bibliography,and a need for further cultivation of individual research on Chinese Bibliographers;on the other hand,there is an urgent need to strengthen the construction of basic materials for academic history,such as academic chronology.