期刊文献+

Driving factors of tree biomass and soil carbon pool in xerophytic forests of northeastern Argentina

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background The conversion of forests into agricultural lands can be a threat because the forests carbon stored could be a source of emissions. The capacity to improve the predictions on the consequences of land use change depends on the identification of factors that influence carbon pools. We investigated the key driving factors of tree biomass and soil carbon pools in xerophytic forests in northeastern Argentina. Based on analyses of forest structure variables and abiotic factors (topography and soil properties) from 18 mature forests, we evaluated carbon pools using uniand multivariate (redundancy analysis) methods. Results The total carbon pool was estimated at 102.4 ± 24.0 Mg ha−1. Soil organic carbon storage is the single largest carbon pool relative to tree biomass, representing 73.1% of total carbon. Tree canopy cover and basal area were positively correlated with biomass carbon pool (r = 0.77 and r = 0.73, p < 0.001, respectively), proving to be significant drivers of carbon storage in this compartment. Slope, soil clay content and cation-exchange capacity had a better explanation for the variability in soil carbon pools, and all showed significant positive correlations with soil carbon pools (r = 0.64, 0.60 and 0.50;p < 0.05, respectively). The vertisols showed a 27.8% higher soil carbon stock than alfisols. Conclusions The relevance of our study stems from a dearth of information on carbon pools and their drivers in xerophytic forests, and in particular, the importance of this ecosystems’ type for Argentina, because they cover 81.9% of native forest area. Basal area and tree canopy cover exert a strong effect on the carbon pool in tree biomass but not in the soil. The results suggests that there is a potentially major SOC accumulation in forests located in slightly sloping areas and soils with higher topsoil clay content, such as vertisols. This could provide an important reference for implementing forestry carbon sink projects.
出处 《Ecological Processes》 SCIE EI CSCD 2023年第1期916-928,共13页 生态过程(英文)
基金 funded by projects PID UNER 2223“Carbon capture and fixation as an environmental service of the Espinal forests” National Observatory of Land Degradation and Desertification of Argentina PD INTA I040“Design and implementation of a national system for degradation monitoring system at different scales for land degradation neutrality”.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献38

  • 1Alaoui, A., Lipiec, J. and Gerke, H. H. 2011. A review of the changes in the soil pore system due to soil deformation: A hydrodynamic perspective. Soil Till. Res. 115-116: 1-15.
  • 2American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D4318. 1995. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limitand Plasticity Index of Soils. Annual Book of ASTM Stan- dards, Volume 04.08. American Society for Testing and Ma- terials.
  • 3Balbino, L. C., Bruand, A., Brossard, M., Grimaldi, M., Hajnos, M. and Guimares, M. F. 2002. Changes in porosity and mi- croaggregation in clayey Ferralsols of the Brailian Cerrado on clearing for pasture. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 53: 219-230.
  • 4Bruand, A., Hartmann, C., Ratana-Anupap, S., Sindhusen, P., Poss, R. and Hardy, M. 2004. Composition, fabric and poro- sity of an Arenic Haplustalf of Northeast Thailand: Relation to penetration resistance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 185-193.
  • 5Cameron, K. C. and Buchan, G. D. 2006. Porosity and pore size distribution. In Lal, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Soil Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp. 1350-1353.
  • 6Chun, H. C., Gim@nez, D. and Yoon, S. W. 2008. Morphology, lacunarity and entropy of intra-aggregate pores: Aggregate size and soil management effects. Geoderma. 146: 83-93.
  • 7Churchman, G. J., Foster, R. C., D'Acqui, L. P., Janik, L. J., Skjemstad, J. O., Merry, R. H. and Weissmann, D. A. 2010. Effect of land-use history on the potential for carbon seques- tration in an Alfisol. Soil Till. Res. 109:23-35.
  • 8Dexter, A. R., Czyz, E. A., Richard, G. and Reszkowska, A. 2008. A user-friendly water retention function that takes account of the textural and structural pore spaces in soil. Geoderma. 143: 243-253.
  • 9Echeverrfa, J. C., Morera, M. T., Mazkiarn, C. and Garrido, J. J. 1999. Characterization of the porous structure of soils: Adsorption of nitrogen (77 K) and carbon dioxide (273 K), and mercury porosimetry. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50: 497-503.
  • 10Ehlers, W., Wendroth, O. and de Mol, F. 1995. Characterizing pore organization by soil physical parameters. In Hartge, K. H. and Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Soil StructureIts Develop- ment and Function. CRC, Boca Raton. pp. 257-275.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部