台湾问题的国际法解读(下)——对台湾问题若干错误法律观点的批驳

An International Law Interpretation of the Taiwan Question(Part Two):A Rebuttal to Several Erroneous Legal Arguments Regarding the Taiwan question

1949年以来,总有一些外国敌对势力和在中国台湾的分离主义势力,试图损害中国主权和领土完整、阻挠中国实现国家统一。他们制造了一些说法,包括杜鲁门的“台湾地位未定论”、李登辉的“两国论”、陈水扁的“一边一国论”等。本文对这些说法及个别趋炎附势学者提供的所谓“法理依据”进行深入分析和批驳。本文还对民族自决权和禁止使用武力等国际法原则的适用情景进行了探讨。本文在结论中指出,台独公投非法,中国不放弃武统合法,而任何外部势力企图武力干涉中国实现统一,则必然违背国际法,中国拥有自卫权。

Since 1949,there were always some hostile forces abroad and separatist forces in Taiwan,China that attempts to undermine China's sovereignty and territorial integrity or stands in the way of its reunification.And for this purpose,they fabricated some“theories”such as Trumen's“the status of Taiwan is undetermined”,Lee Teng-hui's“two states”and Chen Shui-bian's“one state on each side of the Strait”,etc.This article is an in deep analyze and a critique of the above-mentioned“theories”and so-called“legal arguments”provided by several opportunist scholars.This article discusses also the principles of self-determination and the ban of use of force in the case of Taiwan Question.It concludes that a referendum for“independence of Taiwan”is illicit in international law,that China's possible use of force in its way to unification is quite legitime because it does not break the ban of use of force in international law.And on the contrary,any attempt by a foreign force to interfere militarily is illegal and China has the right of self-defense on this matter.