摘要
2022年“山东高校科研代表性成果评价调查”发现:评价必要性认同度高,但对成果形式与数量的认识不一;小同行专家是最受认可的评价主体;学术型高校实施条件较为充分;职称评审是评价结果应用最主要领域。当前存在评价标准难以达成共识、评价制度施行不力两大问题,评价满意度亟待提高。健全分类分级的评价体系、坚持成果确定过程中的质量标准和创新性导向、不断完善同行评议制度是解决上述问题的可行路径。
The 2022“Representative Scientific Research Achievements Evaluation Survey among Shandong Colleges and Universities”revealed the findings as follows:there is a high degree of recognition for the necessity of evaluation;there are different understandings of the form and quantity of achievements;small peer experts are the most recognized evaluation subjects;academic universities have sufficient conditions for implementation;and professional title evaluation is the most important field for the application of evaluating results.Currently,there are two major problems:difficulty in reaching consensus on evaluation standards and ineffective implementation of evaluation systems,and evaluation satisfaction urgently demanding further improvement.A sound classification and grading evaluation system,adherence to quality standards and innovation orientation in the process of determining results,and continuous improvement of the peer review system are feasible paths to solve the above problems.
作者
邵雪
钟长权
李爱萍
高源
宋旭红
Shao Xue;Zhong Changquan;Li Aiping;Gao Yuan;Song Xuhong
出处
《山东高等教育》
2024年第4期1-7,89,共8页
Review of Higher Education
基金
2021年度山东省人文社会科学课题“山东高校教师代表性成果评价制度设计”的阶断性成果。
关键词
科研代表性成果评价
分级分类评价
小同行专家评议
创新性导向
evaluation of representative scientific research achievements
graded and classified evaluation
small peer review
innovation orientation