期刊文献+

基于冗余分析与受体模型的岷江水质特征与流域污染源解析

Water Quality Characteristics and Watershed Pollution Sources in the Minjiang River Based on Redundancy Analysis and Receptor Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于岷江眉山段地表水水质数据与土地利用指标,利用冗余分析(RDA)阐明水质对土地利用的响应机制,并将此作为辅助信息来优化正定矩阵因子分解(PMF)模型中的污染源解析过程,为污染源判定提供科学依据。结果表明,研究区以氮磷和有机污染为主,各水质指标间存在不同程度关联性;土地利用指标对水质指标的影响方式和强度不同,耕地、建设用地、人口密度、化肥施用量和单位面积工业GDP表现为对水质不利的因素,林地和草地为对水质保护有利的因素;污染源贡献依次为企业点源污染排放(23.13%)>农业面源污染(18.71%)>季节因素(16.67%)>生活污水排放(15.56%)>城市面源污染(15.26%)>自然源(10.67%)。 Accurate identification of water pollution sources is a prerequisite for effective pollution control and sustainable watershed management.In this study,the relatively polluted Meishan section of the middle Minjiang River was selected for research.We elucidated the response mechanism of water quality to land use based on surface water quality data at 11 monitoring sites in the Meishan section and the distribution of each land use type in 2019 using redundancy analysis(RDA).The response mechanism of water quality to land use was then used as auxiliary information to optimize the pollution source analysis process of the positive matrix factorization(PMF)model.The study area was primarily affected by nitrogen,phosphorus,and organic pollution,and there were varying degrees of correlation among different water quality parameters.The impact of land use indicators on water quality parameters varied in mode and intensity.Cultivated land,construction land,population density,chemical fertilizer application,and industrial GDP per unit area were factors detrimental to water quality,while forest and grassland were beneficial for water quality.The identification and quantitative analysis of the pollution sources was completed by combining RDA and PMF model analysis,and the results shows that the contribution rates of different pollution sources were as follows:industrial point source pollution(23.13%)>agricultural non-point source pollution(18.71%)>seasonal factors(16.67%)>domestic sewage discharge(15.56%)>urban non-point source pollution(15.26%)>natural sources(10.67%).The primary contributing indicators of industrial point source pollution were F^(-)(48.70%),TN(45.42%),and COD_(Cr)(36.52%).The primary contributing indicators of agricultural non-point source pollution were NH_(3)-N(65.99%),TN(25.92%),and TP(22.70%).Organic pollutionrelated parameters such as COD_(Mn),COD_(Cr),BOD_(5),and petroleum were the main loading indicators for domestic sewage and urban non-point source pollution.The primary contributing indicator for natural sources was As,with a contribution rate exceeding 60%,but the average concentration was low and the overall impact of natural sources was relatively small.This study provides a new method and approach for tracing pollution sources in watershed water pollution prevention and control.
作者 任兴念 陈斯恺 郭珊珊 高东东 王春 张涵 REN Xing-nian;CHEN Si-kai;GUO Shan-shan;GAO Dong-dong;WANG Chun;ZHANG Han(School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,P.R.China;China 19th Metallurgical Corporation,Chengdu 610031,P.R.China;Institute ofWater Environment,Sichuan Academy of Environmental Science,Chengdu 610000,P.R.China)
出处 《水生态学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期142-150,共9页 Journal of Hydroecology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(52170104,51979237) 四川省科技厅自然科学基金项目(23NSFSC0838) 长江生态环境保护修复联合研究二期项目(2022-LHYJ-02-0509-10)。
关键词 水环境 流域污染 PMF模型 冗余分析 源解析 岷江 water environment watershed pollution positive matrix factorization(PMF)model redundancy analysis source identification Minjiang river
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部