期刊文献+

中国学者撤销论文的撤销时滞影响因素研究——基于撤稿观察数据库

Influencing factors of retraction time lag of papers by Chinese scholars:Based on Retraction Watch database
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】分析能够反映科学界的净化时效的撤销时滞的影响因素,为缩短撤销时滞提供参考。【方法】收集撤稿观察数据库1970—2022年共17916条论文数据,以撤销时滞为因变量,从政策、论文和作者维度选择33个变量作为自变量构建回归模型,分析不同因素对撤销时滞的影响。【结果】研究论文、发表年份、图像问题、论文工厂和荟萃分析是撤销时滞的主要影响因素,科研诚信政策对撤销时滞无影响。【结论】建议强化图像问题诚信意识,畅通论文举报机制,重视论文工厂问题并关注不同规模科研团队的诚信问题。 [Purposes]The retraction time lag can reflect the purification time of the scientific community.Analyzing the influencing factors of time lags can provide a reference for reducing the retraction time lag.[Methods]We collected a total of 17916 papers from 1970 to 2022 from the Retraction Watch database.Using time to retract as the dependent variable,we selected 33 variables as independent variables from the dimensions of policy,paper,and author as dependent variables to construct a regression model and analyzed the influence of different factors on the retraction time lag.[Findings]Research papers,publication dates,image problems,paper factories,and meta-analyses are the main factors influencing the retraction time lag,and the research integrity policy does not affect it.[Conclusions]It is suggested to strengthen the awareness of the integrity of image problems,optimize the paper reporting mechanism,address the problem of paper factories,and pay attention to the integrity of scientific research teams of different scales.
作者 陈俊辉 张丽华 CHEN Junhui;ZHANG Lihua(School of Information,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,140 Wucheng Road,Xiaodian District,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第7期995-1003,共9页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
关键词 撤销时滞 撤稿观察数据库 撤销论文 回归分析 Retraction time lag Retraction Watch database Retracted paper Regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献98

  • 1关于加强科研行为规范建设的意见[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(2):204-205. 被引量:24
  • 2Drake D C,Maritz B,Jacobs S M,et al.The propagation and dispersal of misinformation in ecology:Is there a relationship between citation accuracy and journal impact factor?.Hydrobiologia,2013,702(1):1-4.
  • 3Drury N E,Karamanou D M.Citation of retracted articles:a call for vigilance.Ann Thorac Surg,2009,87(2):670.
  • 4Chen C,Hu Z,Milbank J,et al.A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(2):234-253.
  • 5Van Noorden R.The trouble with retractions.Nature,2011,478(7367):26-28.
  • 6Oransky I,Marcus A.Retraction Watch.http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com.
  • 7国家科技计划实施中科研不端行为处理办法(试行)[EB/OL].[2007-01-01].http://www.gov.cn/ziliao/flfg/2006-11/1 0/content_438430.htm.
  • 8Errata,Retraction,Duplicate Publication,Comment,Update and Patient Summary Policy forMEDLINE[EB/OL].[2008-04-01].http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/errata.html.
  • 9Wager Elizabeth,Williams Peter.Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.Journal of medical ethics,2011,37(9):567-570.
  • 10Nath Sara B,Marcus Steven C,Druss Benjamin G.Retractions in the research literature:misconduct or mistakes?.The Medical Journal of Australia,2006,185 (3):152-154.

共引文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部