前列腺铥激光剜除术与等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的对比研究

Thulium laser enucleation versus plasma kinetic resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

目的:探讨前列腺铥激光剜除术(ThuLEP)与等离子电切术(PKRP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的对比研究。方法:回顾性研究本院2021年1月至2023年12月收治的160例BPH患者病历资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为观察组(n=80)和对照组(n=80)。对照组实施PKRP治疗,观察组实施ThuLEP治疗。比较两组的手术时间、膀胱冲洗时间、导管留置时间、住院时间,并比较两组术前、术后3个月的最大尿流速(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积的变化情况和术后并发症。结果:观察组的手术时间、膀胱冲洗时间、导管留置时间、住院时间[(60.10±5.15)min、(43.24±6.65)h、(5.03±1.24)d、(6.55±1.67)d]均短于对照组[(67.25±7.24)min、(46.90±10.77)h、(5.60±1.31)d、(7.31±2.00)d,P<0.05)];观察组术后3个月的Qmax水平[(20.68±1.45)ml/s]高于对照组[(18.50±1.24)ml/s],PVR、PSA、前列腺体积水平[(10.82±3.10)ml、(3.38±0.40)μg/L、(20.12±5.13)ml]均低于对照组[(12.10±3.53)ml、(4.60±0.78)μg/L、(25.35±6.46)ml,P<0.05)];两组术后并发症的总发生率(7.50%vs 5.00%),无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:ThuLEP治疗BPH具有显著疗效,能够缩减手术及住院时长,改善尿流动力学和前列腺功能,值得推广。

Objective:To compare thulium laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuLEP)with plasma kinetic resection of the prostate(PKRP)in the treatment of BPH.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 160 cases of BPH treated by ThuLEP(the observation group,n=80)or PKRP(the control group,n=80)in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023.We recorded the operation time,bladder irrigation time,catheter retention time,hospitalization time,postoperative complications,and pre-and postoperative maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax),residual urine volume(PVR),prostate-specific antigen(PSA)and prostate volume,followed by comparison of the data obtained between the two groups of patients.Results:Compared with the controls,the patients of the observation group showed significantly shorter operation time([67.25±7.24]vs[60.10±5.15]min,P<0.05),bladder irrigation time([46.90±10.77]vs[43.24±6.65]h,P<0.05),catheterization time([5.60±1.31]vs[5.03±1.24]d,P<0.05)and hospitalization time([7.31±2.00]vs[6.55±1.67]d,P<0.05),higher Qmax([18.50±1.24]vs[20.68±1.45]ml/s,P<0.05),lower PVR([12.10±3.53]vs[10.82±3.10]ml,P<0.05),PSA([4.60±0.78]vs[3.38±0.40]μg/L,P<0.05)and prostate volume([25.35±6.46]vs[20.12±5.13]ml,P<0.05)at 3 months after surgery,but no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications(7.50%[6/80]vs 5.00%[4/80],P>0.05).Conclusion:ThuLEP,with its advantages of notable effect,short operation and hospitalization time,significant improvement of urinary flow dynamics and prostate function,deserves clinical promotion for the treatment of BPH.