告别“强制性”期刊发表?--论我国法学博士生评价制度的困境与出路

Farewell to“Compulsory”Journal Publication?--The Dilemma and the Way Out of the Evaluation System of China’s Ph.D.in Law

“强制性”期刊发表制度已成为影响我国法学博士生学术成长环境的核心因素。德国作为法学博士培养强国,其法学博士生评价制度值得我国借鉴。我国法学博士生学术评价制度应当具备学术人才培育和分流两项核心功能。具言之,我国法学培养院校应收回对博士生的学术评价权,评价内容应以博士论文为主,以小论文为辅,博士生的学术成果均应分级评定并予以公开。信息时代的公开发表不等同于期刊发表,电子学术平台是展示博士生学术成果的理想平台。此外,期刊发表宜转型为评价制度外的自愿选项,并建议引入市场化机制规范博士生的“广撒网式”投稿行为和学术期刊的不专业审稿行为。

The“compulsory”journal publication system has become a core factor that affecting the academic growth environment for China's Ph.D.in Law.As a strong country in the cultivation of Ph.D.in Law,Germany has its evaluation system which worth to learn.The academic evaluation system for China's Ph.D.in Law should have two core functions:cultivating and screening academic talent.Specifically,Chinese law schools should take back the academic evaluation power of doctoral students,and the evaluation contents should mainly focus on the doctoral dissertation,supplemented by short articles.The academic achievements of doctoral students should be graded and made public.Journal Publication in the information age is not the same as journal publication,and electronic academic platforms are an ideal way to showcase doctoral studentsacademic achievements.In addition,journal publication should be transformed into a voluntary option outside the evaluation system,and it is recommended to introduce market mechanisms to regulate doctoral studentssubmission behavior such as“casting the net a lot wider”and unprofessional review behavior of academic journals.