期刊文献+

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为评估工具研究进展

Research progress of sedentary behavior evaluation tools for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 慢性阻塞性肺疾病是一种异质性的肺部状态,由于气道和/或肺泡异常所造成的持续性气流阻塞导致。近年来,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者稳定期的身体活动成为医疗干预的重点,是其病死率的有力监测指标,而久坐行为作为身体活动类别中的一种,对患者的健康结局、机体新陈代谢和功能具有定性和独立的有害影响。因此,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的久坐行为成为国内外学者的研究热点,开展客观准确的久坐行为评估是首要步骤。本文对国内外慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为的评估方法及优缺点进行综述,旨在为我国学者开发及科学应用久坐行为评估工具提供参考,为提升慢病患者久坐行为危害认知以及促进健康生活方式提供干预依据。 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)is a heterogeneous lung state,which is caused by persistent airflow obstruction caused by airway and/or alveolar abnormalities.In recent years,the physical activity of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in stable period has become the focus of medical intervention,which is a powerful monitoring index of their mortality.As a kind of physical activity,sedentary behavior has qualitative and independent harmful effects on patients’health outcome and body metabolism and function.Therefore,the sedentary behavior of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has become a research hotspot of scholars at home and abroad,and it is the first step to carry out objective and accurate sedentary behavior evaluation.This paper reviews the sedentary behavior evaluation methods at home and abroad for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their advantages and disadvantages,aiming at providing reference for Chinese scholars to develop and scientifically apply sedentary behavior evaluation tools,as well as providing intervention basis for improving the cognition of sedentary behavior hazards of patients with chronic diseases and promoting healthy lifestyles.
作者 景阅雯 马燕 钱昭君 JING Yuewen;MA Yan;QIAN Zhaojun(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Nanjing Central Hospital,Jiangsu,Nanjing 210000,China;Department of Nursing,Nanjing Central Hospital,Jiangsu,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处 《中国医药科学》 2024年第17期50-53,90,共5页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
基金 2023年度南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK23199)。
关键词 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 久坐行为 评估工具 综述 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Sedentary behavior Eval uation tools Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1李可基,张宝慧.国际组织和各国政府关于运动促进健康政策及措施的分析与比较[J].体育科学,2003,23(1):91-95. 被引量:37
  • 2肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4192
  • 3Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman AE, et al. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults. Int J Epidemiol,1996,25∶153-159.
  • 4Bassett DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.Res Q Exerc Sport,2000,71(suppl)∶s30-s36.
  • 5Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1993,25∶81-91.
  • 6Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC, Unwin NC, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies in Sub-Saharal Africa.Int J Epidemiol,2001,30∶1361-1368.
  • 7Taylor CB, Coffey T, Berra K, et al. Seven-day activity and self-report compared to direct measure of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol,1984,120∶818-824.
  • 8Dishman RK, Steinhardt M. Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d recall of physical activity in college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1988,20∶14-25.
  • 9US Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity & Health,1996.
  • 10Laporte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Rep,1985,100∶131-146.

共引文献443

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部