期刊文献+

复杂系统视阈下“畏惧自然”环境伦理观的当代建构--基于约纳斯“责任原理”的考察

The Contemporary Construction of Environmental Ethics of"Fear for Nature"from the Perspective of Complex Systems:an Investigation based on Jonas'"Imperative of Responsibility"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建具有较强道德约束力和实践规范性的环境伦理观,是破解当今生态危机、确立人类在自然系统中合理定位的理论基石。由于“非人存在物”是否具有内在价值或固有价值存有广泛争议,“畏惧自然”可以成为一种比敬畏生命、尊重自然更有思想根基、更有理论依据、更具道德约束力,且更少争议的环境伦理方案。由于自然系统的复杂性、行为演化的不可预测性等,以及人类对自然的依附性和已拥有强大的技术“力量”,为了保证未来“人类必须存在”,人类不得不“畏惧自然”。人类的思想观念层面要求对自然时刻保持畏惧的心理状态,理论认知层面要求运用“弹性思维”维持系统的稳定以防止不合理行为导致的系统崩溃,只消耗“利润”、不损害“资本”构成实践规范层面的核心内容。三个维度有机统一,共同构成规范人类行为的“畏惧自然”环境伦理体系。 The construction of an environmental ethics with stronger moral constraints and practical normativity is the theoretical cornerstone for solving todays ecological crisis and establishing a reasonable position of humans within the natural system.Given the extensive debate on whether"non-human entities"possess intrinsic or inherent value,the"fear for nature"can serve as an environmental ethics scheme that is rooted in deeper thought,backed by stronger theoretical justifications,possesses stronger moral constraint,and incurs less controversy compared to"reverence for life"or"respect for nature".Due to the complexity of natural systems,the unpredictability of their behavioral evolution,along with humanity's dependency on nature and possession of powerful technological forces,humans must keep their"fear for nature"to ensure the"there be a mankind"in the future.At the level of ideological concepts,we need to maintain a state of fear for nature at all times;at the level of theoretical understanding,we must use"resilience thinking"to maintain the stability of the system to prevent irrational behavior from causing system collapse;consuming only the"profits"and not damaging the"capital"forms the core content at the level of practical norms.These three dimensions organically unite to form a systematic environmental ethics of"fear for nature"which regulates human behavior.
作者 叶立国 Ye Liguo(College of Marxism,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao,266580,P.R.China)
出处 《北京林业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024年第3期40-47,共8页 Journal of Beijing Forestry University :Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“生态学范式争论的哲学研究”(16ZDA112) 中央基本科研业务经费项目“系统科学范式研究”(20CX04007B)。
关键词 畏惧自然 复杂系统 责任原理 敬畏生命 尊重自然 fear for nature complex systems the imperative of responsibility reverence for life respect for nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献97

  • 1叶立国.“系统科学范式”研究述评[J].系统科学学报,2009,17(4):25-30. 被引量:5
  • 2刘福森.自然中心主义生态伦理观的理论困境[J].中国社会科学,1997(3):45-53. 被引量:212
  • 3何祚庥.人类无须敬畏大自然[J].环境教育,2005(3):22-23. 被引量:7
  • 4方舟子."敬畏大自然"就是反科学[J].环境教育,2005(3):24-24. 被引量:3
  • 5辛普里.“敬畏自然”论战的启示与挑战[J].科技文萃,2005(4):168-172. 被引量:1
  • 6T Deacon. The Hierarchic Logic of Emergence: Untangling the Interdependence of Evolution and Self-Organization [A]. In Bruce Weber& David Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning:The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. MA: MIT Press, 2003.
  • 7T Deacon. Three Levels of Emergent Phenomena [A]. In N C Murphy & W R Stoeger (eds.), Evolution & Emergence.. Systems, Organisms, Persons. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2007:88 - 110.
  • 8J Holland. Emergence: from Chaos to Order[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 125.
  • 9F Heylighen. The Science of Self-orgenization and Adaptivity [A]. In: L Kiel (ed.), Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity. In The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Oxford : Eolss Publishers. http://pespmcl, vub. ac. be/papers/ EOLSS-Self-Organiz. pdf.
  • 10T Deacon. Emergence: The Hole at the Wheel's Hub [A]. In Philip Clayton & Paul Davies (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 136.

共引文献256

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部