期刊文献+

胺碘酮联合琥珀酸美托洛尔治疗急性心肌梗死合并心律失常的效果及对患者心功能的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心律失常患者接受胺碘酮联合琥珀酸美托洛尔治疗的效果及对患者心功能指标方面的影响,为临床提供参考。方法回顾性分析2017年3月至2024年3月通用环球西安北环医院收治的120例AMI合并心律失常患者的临床资料,根据给药方案的不同分为对照组和研究组,各60例。两组患者均进行常规治疗,对照组患者在常规治疗的基础上接受胺碘酮治疗,研究组患者在常规治疗的基础上接受胺碘酮联合琥珀酸美托洛尔治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效、心肌损伤标志物水平、心功能指标水平、血管内皮功能指标水平和不良反应发生情况。结果研究组患者整体疗效优于对照组,总有效率高于对照组(均P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平均降低,且研究组均更低(均P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)水平均升高,左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)水平均低于治疗前,且研究组LVEF水平更高,LVESD、LVEDD水平均更低(均P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者一氧化氮(NO)水平均升高,内皮素-1(ET-1)、血管性假血友病因子(VWF)水平均降低,且研究组NO水平更高,ET-1、VWF水平均更低(均P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论AMI合并心律失常患者接受胺碘酮联合琥珀酸美托洛尔治疗的临床效果好,可改善患者心肌损伤标志物水平、心功能与血管内皮功能,且安全性理想。
作者 何海霞
出处 《大医生》 2024年第17期63-65,共3页 Doctor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献110

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 4Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0904327.

共引文献732

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部