法典化背景下教育法学研究方法的反思与重构

Reflection and Transcendence of the Research Paradigm of Educational Law in the Background of Codification

研究方法的确立事关教育法学的学科建设与学科发展,对教育法典的编纂具有重要的支撑作用。教育法典的编纂从形体和实质两个方面提出了对教育法学研究方法的要求。通过对我国教育法学研究范式的变迁分析,可以发现教育法学的研究方法在整体上受到法学研究方法的影响,主要存在立法法学研究、法教义学研究、社科法学研究三种不同的研究路径。这些不同类型的研究方法对教育法典的编纂各有其效用与优势,但同时也存在一些有待改进的问题。为了更好地支持和服务于教育法典的编纂,教育法学研究应在对上述研究方法进行分析批判的基础之上进行重构:以中国教育法治实践为基本立场,以创新教育法学学科知识体系为主要目标,着力加强和改进不同研究方法的运用,促进规范研究与实证研究的有机融合,以更好地提升教育法学研究的解释力。

The establishment of research methods is related to the discipline construction and development of educational law,and plays an important supporting role in the compilation of educational code.The codification of the educational code puts forward the requirements for the research methods of educational law from two aspects of form and substance.Through the analysis of the evolution of the paradigm of educational law research in China,it can be found that educational law research is affected by the law research methods on the whole.There are mainly three different research methods:legislative law research,legal doctrine research and social science law research.These different types of research methods have their own utility and advantages for the compilation of educational codes,but at the same time there are some problems to be improved.In order to better support and serve the codification of the educational code,researches on educational law should be reconstructed on the basis of analysis and criticism of the above research methods.Its main path and direction lie in that it should take the basic position of basing itself on the practice of the rule of law in education in China,take the innovation of the knowledge system of educational law as the main goal,and strive to strengthen and improve the application of different research methods.Also,it's important to promote the organic integration of normative research and empirical research in order to enhance the explanatory power of educational law research.