不作为型容留他人吸毒的认定路径与规则--以莫某某容留他人吸毒案为切入点

The Approach and Rules of Derivative Omission Offenses on the Cases of Providing a Venue for Drug Users--Taking the Case of"Mo's Providing a Venue for Drug Users"as Starting Point

我国已将不作为型容留他人吸毒司法犯罪化,这不违反罪刑法定原则,但应注意防止该罪在司法适用中的不当扩张;认定该罪的不真正不作为犯,关键在于确定不作为的作为义务来源。对作为义务的判断不能只停留在形式层面,还应对其进行等价性实质判断;只有与该罪的作为行为具有同等违法价值的不作为行为才构成犯罪。不作为型容留他人吸毒构成犯罪的认定规则,应以不同行为主体为区分;只有对吸毒场所具有绝对的、现实的、排他性支配地位的主体,在未履行法律法规、职业、经营等所要求的制止、举报义务时,才能成立容留他人吸毒罪的不真正不作为犯。

In the judicial application,derivative omission offenses on providing a venue for drug users has been criminalized in China.This judicial phenomenon doesn’t violate the principle of legality of crime.However,attention should be paid to preventing the improper of expansion of the crime in judicial application.The key to definite Derivative Omission Offenses of the crime is to determine the act obligation.The Judgement of act obligation should not only stay in the form level,but also carry on the equivalence substantive judgement.Only the derivative omission offenses with the same illegal value as the action offenses constitutes a crime.The rules of de⁃termining the crime of derivative omission should be distinguished by different subjects.Only when the subjects with absolute,realistic and exclusive dominance over drug-taking place,failing to fulfill the obligation of stopping and re-porting as required by laws and regu⁃lations,occupation and management,etc.,commits derivative omission offenses on Crime of Providing a Venue for Drug Users.