非对峙型受虐妇女反杀案的出罪事由

Prosecution of Non-confrontational Battered Women's Anti-murder Cases

受虐妇女选择在家暴结束后趁丈夫熟睡或者以下毒的方式将其杀害,这是一种典型的非对峙型受虐妇女反杀行为,入罪结论不符合民众的情感期待,出罪空间有限。其出罪难点是不符合正当防卫“不法侵害正在进行”的时间条件,容易定性为事前防卫;如果通过“受虐妇女综合症”把这种家暴行为视为一种持续侵害行为,容易定性为事后防卫。因此,理解非对峙型受虐妇女反杀案的出罪逻辑,应从紧急避险的“防御性”上做实质判断,受虐妇女为避免遭受家暴,当施暴丈夫对其实施不法侵害难以察觉时,基于生命权冲突的利益衡量,不得已选择反杀行为具有出罪的正当性。

Abused women choose to kill their husbands while their husbands are asleep or under poison after the end of domestic violence.This is a typical non-confrontational anti-killing behavior of abused women.The conclusion of conviction does not meet the emotional expectations of the public,and the space for conviction is limited.The difficulty of its conviction is that it does not meet the time conditions of legitimate defense"unlawful infringement is ongoing",and it is easy to be characterized as ex ante defense;if this kind of domestic violence is regarded as a continuous violation through"battered women syndrome",it is easy to be characterized as ex-post facto defense.Therefore,to understand the decriminalization logic of non-confrontational battered women's anti-murder cases,we should make a substantive judgment on the"defensiveness"of emergency hedging.In order to avoid domestic violence,battered women have to choose anti-murder behavior based on the conflict of interests of the right to life when it is difficult to detect the unlawful infringement by the violent husband.