摘要
目的单侧双通道脊柱内镜(UBE)技术被广泛应用于腰椎间盘突出症和腰椎管狭窄症的治疗。本研究通过分析该技术的学习曲线,旨在为此类手术方式的实施和学习流程提供参考。方法回顾性分析了2021年6月至2023年12月期间在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院骨科中心脊柱外科接受UBE的腰椎管狭窄症患者情况。收集所有患者的基线信息、手术时间、失血量、并发症以及主观评分。采用累积总和法(CUSUM)对学习曲线进行评估。结果共纳入122例接受单节段UBE-ULBD手术的患者。平均随访时间为(10.51±2.44)个月(8~20个月),手术节段包括L2/3(3例)、L3/4(13例)、L4/5(85例)和L5/S1(21例)。根据手术时间曲线拟合的结果,对患者队列根据不同的掌握熟练度进行分组。即学习阶段组(第1~38例)和掌握阶段组(第39~122例)。学习阶段组的手术时间长于掌握阶段组[(153.3±44.0)min与(129.2±34.5)min,t=2.978,P<0.05],失血量高于掌握阶段组[(62.4±42.3)min与(53.1±31.5)min,t=1.209,P>0.05],但隐性失血量低于掌握阶段组[(207.1±140.5)min与(211.2±110.9)min,t=-0.160,P>0.05]。学习阶段组的引流量多于掌握阶段组[(64.1±43.1)min与(29.4±34.4)min,t=-4.752,P<0.05]。两组患者术前、术后即刻、末次随访时进行重复测量设计的方差分析显示两组患者的ODI评分不同组别间差异无统计学意义(F=3.502,P=0.062),不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(F=347.190,P<0.001),组别与时间点间无交互作用(F=0.071,P=0.931);腰痛的VAS评分方面发现不同组别间差异有统计学意义(F=32.691,P=0.000),不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(F=866.102,P<0.001),组别与时间点间无交互作用(F=0.665,P=0.862)。腿痛的VAS评分方面发现不同组别间差异有统计学意义(F=24.980,P<0.001),不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(F=693.920,P<0.001),组别与时间点间无交互作用(F=1.986,P=0.139)。结论作为一种治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效的微创脊柱内镜技术,UBE-ULBD手术需要大约38例才能克服学习曲线。如果能成功克服学习曲线,该技术将具有手术微创、操作灵活高效、术后恢复快等优点。
Objective Unilateral biportal endoscopy(UBE)technique is widely used in the treat-ment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis.By analyzing the learning curve of this technique,this study aims to inform the implementation and learning process of such surgical modalities.Methods Pa-tients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent UBE between June 2021 and December 2023 in the Depart-ment of Spine Surgery,Orthopaedic Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,were retrospectively analyzed.Baseline information,operative time,blood loss,complications,and subjective scores were collected from all patients.The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum(CU-SUM)method.Results A total of 122 patients who underwent single-segment UBE-ULBD were included.The mean follow-up time was(10.51±2.44)months(8-20 months),and the operated segments included L2/3(3 patients),L3/4(13 patients),L4/5(85 patients),and L5/S1(21 patients).Based on the results of surgical time curve fitting,the patient cohort was divided into groups according to different levels of mastery proficiency.Namely,the learning phase group(1-38 cases)and the mastery phase group(39-122 cases).The learning stage group had a longer operative time than the mastery stage group(153.3±44.0 min与129.2±34.5 min,t=2.978,P<0.05),higher blood loss than the mastery stage group(62.4±42.3 min与53.1±31.5 min,t=1.209,P>0.05),but lower hidden blood loss than the mastery stage group(207.1±140.5 min与211.2±110.9 min,t=-0.160,P>0.05).There was more drainage in the learning stage group than in the mastery stage group(64.1±43.1 min与29.4±34.4 min,t=-4.752,P<0.05).ANOVA with repeated measures design at preoperative,imme-diate postoperative,and final follow-up showed no statistically significant difference in ODI scores between the two groups(F=3.502,P=0.062),statistically significant difference between different time points(F=347.190,P=0.000),and no interaction between group and time point(F=0.071,P=0.931);For VAS scores for low back pain a statistically significant difference was found between groups(F=32.691,P=0.000),be-tween time points(F=866.102,P=0.000)and no interaction between groups and time points(F=0.665,P=0.862).In terms of VAS scores for leg pain a statistically significant difference was found between different groups(F=24.980,P=0.000),between different time points(F=693.920,P=0.000),and no interaction be-tween groups and time points(F=1.986,P=0.139).Conclusions As an effective minimally invasive spinal endoscopic technique for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis,the UBE-ULBD procedure requires approx-imately 38 cases to overcome the learning curve.If the learning curve can be successfully overcome,the tech-nique will have the advantages of minimally invasive surgery,flexible and efficient operation,and fast post-operative recovery.
作者
邵佳申
张志武
孟海
杨雍
费琦
Shao Jiashen;Zhang Zhiwu;Meng Hai;Yang Yong;Fei Qi(Department of Spine Surgery,Orthopaedic Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China)
出处
《中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志》
2024年第4期202-208,共7页
Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition)
基金
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院“种子计划”资助项目(YYZZ202230)。
关键词
脊柱内镜
单侧双通道脊柱内镜
腰椎管狭窄症
学习曲线
Spinal endoscopy
Unilateral biportal endoscopy
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Learning curve