期刊文献+

基于多目标的三支决策边界域求解与分类方法

Boundary Domain Solving and Classification Method of Three-Way Decisions Based on MultiObjective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 三支决策将不确定样本划分至边界域进行延迟决策,但需基于损失函数确定阈值,以划分边界域,然而,损失函数通常需要先验知识,具有一定的主观性,因此对边界域划分能力不足。针对这种问题,构建一种多目标三支决策边界域求解方法,从而更好地划分边界域,提升分类性能。采用贝叶斯规则获取样本的条件概率;设定3个目标,包括降低边界域的不确定性、缩小边界域的大小以及减小整个决策区域的错误分类率,通过融入熵权法的TOPSIS(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution)方法求取最优阈值,该方法采用熵权法计算这3个目标所占的权重,得到最优阈值,获得边界域,进行延迟决策;结合不同分类器对边界域进行分类。通过UCI数据集进行对比实验,根据分类准确率和F1值,表明该方法学习到的阈值能合理地划分边界域,建立的模型能取得更好的分类性能。 The three-way decision divides the uncertain samples into the boundary domain for delayed decision,but it needs to determine the threshold based on the loss function to divide the boundary domain.However,the loss function usually needs prior knowledge and has a certain degree of subjective,so the ability to divide the boundary domain is insufficient.First,Bayes’rule is used to obtain the conditional probability of the sample;then,three primary goals are established,including minimizing the uncertainty of the boundary domain,constraining the size of the boundary domain,and reducing the misclassification rate of the whole decision domain.It finds the optimal threshold by incorporating the entropy weight method into TOPSIS(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution)method.This method uses the entropy weight method to calculate the weights of these three goals,obtain the optimal threshold,obtain the boundary domain,and make delayed decisions;finally,a combination of different classifiers is employed to classify the boundary domain.Comparative experiments are carried out on UCI data sets.According to the classification accuracy and F1 value,it shows that the threshold learned by this method can reasonably divide the boundary domain,and the established model can achieve better classification performance.
作者 聂斌 靳海科 杜建强 张玉超 郑学鹏 陈星鑫 苗震 NIE Bin;JIN Haike;DU Jianqiang;ZHANG Yuchao;ZHENG Xuepeng;CHEN Xingxin;MIAO Zhen(College of Computer Science,Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330004,China)
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第19期97-109,共13页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(82260849,82260988,61562045) 江西中医药大学校级科技创新团队发展计划(CXTD22015)。
关键词 分类不确定性 三支决策 边界域 多目标 最优阈值 classification uncertainty three-way decisions boundary domain multi-objective optimal threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献45

  • 1Z Pawlak.Rough sets[J].International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences,1982,11(5):341-356.
  • 2Z Pawlak,S K M Wong,W Ziarko.Rough sets:probabilistic versus deterministic approach[J].International Journal of Man-machine Studies,1988,29(1):81-95.
  • 3Y Y Yao,S K M Wong.A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts .International Journal of Man-machine Studies,1992,37(6):793-809.
  • 4W Ziarko.Variable precision rough set model[J].Journal of Computer and System Science,1993,46(1):39-59.
  • 5D Slezak,W Ziarko.The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2005,40(1-2):81-91.
  • 6Y Y Yao.Probabilistic rough set approximations[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2008,49(2):255-271.
  • 7Y Y Yao.Probabilistic approach to rough sets[J].Expert Systems,2003,20(5):287-297.
  • 8Y Y Yao.Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets[J].Information Sciences,2010,180(3):341-353.
  • 9Y Y Yao,Y Zhao.Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models[J].Information Sciences,2008,178(17):3356-3373.
  • 10Joseph P Herbert,J T Yao.Learning optimal parameters in decision-theoretic rough sets .In Proc.RSKT'09 .Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2009.610-617.

共引文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部