期刊文献+

风沙跃移解析模型的建模思路及存在问题

An overview of analytical models of saltation
原文传递
导出
摘要 以Bagnold模型、S?rensen模型和P?htz-Kok-Herrmann模型(PKH模型)为样本,分析了跃移通量解析模型的发展趋势、建模思路及存在问题。与Bagnold模型不同,Owen类模型的建模包括风廓线方程与颗粒群运动学特征方程的参数化求解等环节。S?rensen模型以反映气固耦合过程的跃移轨迹方程的参数化求解为主要的建模策略。PKH模型分别以气流动量传递方程、能量传递方程及风廓线方程的参数化求解为建模策略,在表观粗糙度、粒载切应力垂直衰减廓线及冲击起动的定量表达等方面取得了重要的进展。改进跃移观测的准确度、进一步理解跃移通量变化的峰值现象、充分考虑多尺度湍流对跃移通量的影响等,是发展解析模型的潜在途径。 Several saltation models including Bagnold model,S?rensen model,and P?htz-Kok-Herrmann(PKH) model have been summarized by analyzing the development trend,model ideas,and problems.In contrast with Bagnold model,the Owen Type of saltation models just like S?rensen model and PKH model involve the parameterized solutions of wind profile equations over aeolian saltation layer and the parameterized motions of saltating particles.The S?rensen model is based on the parametric solution of the leapfrog trajectory equations reflecting the gas-solid coupling process as the main modeling strategy.More specifically and deeply,PKH model parameterizes the force and work rate balances;and the solution of wind profile equations;accordingly,providing new insights into apparent roughness,grain shear stress profile and impact threshold.The analytical saltation models can be improved by more accurate observations,reevaluation of saltation flux peaks,and parameterization of the effect of multi-scale wind on saltation flux.
作者 梅凡民() 杨倩文 李旺 苏进 Fanmin Mei;Qianwen Yang;Wang Li;Jin Su(School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,China;School of Science,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,China)
出处 《中国沙漠》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期14-23,共10页 Journal of Desert Research
基金 陕西省自然科学基金项目(2021JM-448)。
关键词 跃移通量 风沙颗粒 建模思路 表观粗糙度 粒载切应力 saltation flux aeolian saltating particle model ideas apparent roughness airborne stress profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

  • 1慕青松,陈晓辉.临界侵蚀风速与植被盖度之间的关系[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):534-538. 被引量:12
  • 2兹纳门斯基(杨郁华译).沙地风蚀过程的实验研究与沙堆防 止问题[M].北京:科学出版社,1960.120.
  • 3吴正 凌裕泉.风沙运动及其防治的初步研究[J].治沙研究,1965,7:7-14.
  • 4Wolfe S A, Nickling W G. Shear stress partitioning in sparsely vegetated desert canopies[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1996,21 : 607- 620.
  • 5Lancaster N, Baas A. Influence of vegetation cover on sand transport by wind:field studies at Owens Lake,California[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1998,23 : 69-82.
  • 6Dong Z B,Gao S Y, Fryrear D W. Drag coefficient, roughness length and zero plane displacement height as disturbed by artificial standing vegetation[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2001,49:485-505.
  • 7James K, Nickling W G. Reprensent of vegation and other nonerodible elements in Aeolian shear stress partitioning models for predicting transport threshold[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005,110 : F04015.
  • 8()kinG S, Gillette D A,Herrick J E. Multi-seale controls on and consequences of aeolian processes in landscape change in arid and semi arid environments[J].Journal of Arid Environ ments,2006,65:253-275.
  • 9Marshall J K. Drag measurements in roughness arrays of varying density and distribution [J]. Agric Meteorol, 1971,8 : 269 -292.
  • 10Raupach M R, Gillette D A, Leys J F. The effects of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold[J]. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98:3032-3029.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部