期刊文献+

沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗伴慢性射血分数降低心力衰竭的血液透析患者的效果评价

Study on the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of hemodialysis patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗伴慢性射血分数降低心力衰竭(HFrEF)的血液透析(HD)患者的疗效。方法 30例伴慢性HFrEF的HD患者,按照治疗方法不同分为对照组和研究组,每组15例。两组患者均采取常规HD及基础用药治疗,同时,对照组联合贝那普利片治疗,研究组联合沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠片治疗。两组持续用药6个月,比较两组患者治疗前后的左心射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、N末端B型利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)和血钾水平。结果 (1)组内比较:与本组治疗前比较,对照组治疗3、6个月的LVEF升高, LVEDD和NT-proBNP下降(P<0.05);与本组治疗3个月比较,对照组治疗6个月的LVEF、LVEDD、NT-proBNP无差异(P>0.05)。与本组治疗前比较,研究组治疗3、6个月的LVEF升高, LVEDD和NT-proBNP下降(P<0.05);与本组治疗3个月比较,研究组治疗6个月的LVEF、LVEDD无差异(P>0.05),治疗6个月的NT-proBNP下降(P<0.05)。组间比较:研究组治疗3、6个月的LVEF(47.63±5.03)%、(48.17±5.16)%高于对照组的(41.79±4.19)%、(42.28±4.37)%, LVEDD(52.63±3.81)、(51.02±3.49)mm小于对照组的(56.47±4.01)、(55.72±4.13)mm,NT-pro BNP(17916.25±5126.40)、(13152.73±5093.37)pg/ml低于对照组的(24776.63±6609.51)、(23942.45±6393.51)pg/ml(P<0.05)。(2)组内比较:与本组治疗前比较,两组治疗2、4、6个月后血钾无差异(P>0.05)。组间比较:治疗2、4、6个月后,两组血钾水平比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论 沙库巴曲缬沙坦可以用于伴慢性HFrEF的HD患者的心力衰竭治疗,且疗效优于贝那普利,有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective To explore the efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of hemodialysis(HD)patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF).Methods A total of 30 hemodialysis patients with chronic HFrEF were allocated into a control group and an experimental group according to different treatment methods,each comprising of 15 patients.Both groups were treated with conventional HD and basic medication.Meanwhile,the control group received benazepril tablets,while the study group was administered sacubitril/valsartan sodium tablets.Both groups underwent continuous medication for 6 months.Both groups were compared in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),and blood potassium levels.Results(i)Intragroup comparison:compared with the control group before treatment,LVEF increased,LVEDD and NT-proBNP decreased after 3 and 6 months of treatment(P<0.05).There was no difference in LVEF,LVEDD,and NT-proBNP in the control group at 6 months of treatment compared with this group at 3 months of treatment(P>0.05).LVEF increased and LVEDD and NT-proBNP decreased in the study group at 3 and 6 months of treatment compared with those before treatment in this group(P<0.05).Compared with those at 3 months after treatment,there was no significant change in LVEF and LVEDD in the study group after 6 months of treatment(P>0.05),and the NT-proBNP of the study group decreased after 6 months of treatment(P<0.05).Comparison between groups:LVEF of the study group were(47.63±5.03)%and(48.17±5.16)%after 3 and 6 months of treatment,which were higher than(41.79±4.19)%and(42.28±4.37)%of the control group;LVEDD were(52.63±3.81)and(51.02±3.49)mm,which were smaller than(56.47±4.01)and(55.72±4.13)mm of the control group;NT-proBNP were(17916.25±5126.40)and(13152.73±5093.37)pg/ml,which were lower than(24776.63±6609.51)and(23942.45±6393.51)pg/ml of the control group(P<0.05).(ii)Compared with before treatment,there was no change in blood potassium in the two groups after 2,4 and 6 months of treatment(P>0.05).Comparison between groups:after 2,4 and 6 months of treatment,there was no difference in serum potassium level between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Sacubactril-valsartan can be used in the treatment of heart failure in HD patients with chronic HFrEF,and the efficacy is better than benazepril,which has high clinical application value.
作者 郭吉雷 GUO Ji-lei(The people's Hospital of Xintai City(Affiliated Hospital of Qilu Medical University),Xintai 271200,China)
出处 《中国实用医药》 2024年第19期17-20,共4页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 沙库巴曲缬沙坦 贝那普利 血液透析 心力衰竭 Sacubitril-valsartan Benazepril Hemodialysis Heart failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

  • 1吕红伟,王建莉.精细化护理在老年重症颅脑损伤患者术后感染控制中的应用[J].中国预防医学杂志,2020(5):532-535. 被引量:16
  • 2刘艳梅,李红旗,庞可心.沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合螺内酯治疗慢性心力衰竭对左室射血分数及血浆NT-proBNP的影响[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2021,18(4):44-47. 被引量:31
  • 3托伐普坦临床研究协作组,张健,朱文玲.常规治疗基础上联用托伐普坦片治疗心原性水肿的有效性和安全性的多中心随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2017,1(1):15-21. 被引量:26
  • 4侯凡凡.慢性肾脏病的心血管并发症[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32:16-16.
  • 5何长民 张训 见:何长民 张训主编.前言[A].见:何长民,张训主编.肾脏替代治疗学[C].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,1999.2..
  • 6Locatelli F, Pozzoni P, Tentori F, et al. Epidemiology of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003,18 Suppl 7:2-9.
  • 7Muntner P, He J, Hamm L, et al. Renal insufficiency and subsequent death resulting from cardiovascular disease in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002,13:745-753.
  • 8Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Ibrahim H, et al. Level of kidney function as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,41:47-55.
  • 9Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic disease in patients starting end-stage renal disease therapy. Kidney Int, 1995,47:186-192.
  • 10Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC,et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease. A statement from the American Heart Association Councils on kidney in cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure research, clinical cardiology, and epidemiology and prevention. Circulation, 2003,108:2154-2169.

共引文献5955

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部