党政联合发文的行政司法效力研究——基于100份行政裁判文书的分析

Research on the Administrative and Judicial Effectiveness of Party-Government Joint Documents:Analysis Based on 100 Administrative Adjudication Documents

党政联合发文因其兼具党内法规与行政法规的双重属性,对相关机关职责及公众权利义务可能产生重要影响,从而具备进入行政司法审判的可能性。对100份涉及党政联合发文的行政裁判文书进行分析发现,党政联合发文的纠纷常集中于信息公开与司法审查两方面,且在司法实践中党政联合发文通常不被纳入行政规范性文件之列,仅作为法官裁判说理时的参照依据。为了充分发挥党政联合文件的功能价值,缓解其与现行司法适用规则之间的紧张关系,有必要通过明确党政联合文件的法源地位,构建实质审查标准以及完善司法救济体系等方式,提升党政联合发文在行政司法实践中的合法性和规范性,从而推进国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化进程。

The joint publication of party-government documents,due to its dual nature of party regulations and administrative regulations,may have a significant impact on the responsibilities of relevant agencies and public rights and obligations,thus having the possibility of entering administrative judicial trials.An analysis of 100 such documents has found that disputes often focus on two aspects:information disclosure and judicial review.In judicial practice,party-government joint publications are usually not included in the list of administrative normative documents,but only serve as a reference for judges to make judgments and reasoning.In order to fully leverage the functional value of the documents and alleviate the tense relationship between them and current judicial application rules,it is necessary to clarify their legal source status,establish substantive review standards,and improve the judicial relief system to enhance their legitimacy and standardization in administrative judicial practice,thereby promoting the modernization process of the national governance system and governance capacity.