期刊文献+

基于核心素养的中学语文鉴赏评价学习进阶框架研究

Research on the Learning Progression Framework for Appreciation and Evaluation of Chinese Language Based on Key Competency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 明确学生认知发展阶段与思维提升路径,对于落实语文课程标准、培养学生核心素养具有重要意义。本研究借鉴国际学习进阶理论与实践经验,构建鉴赏评价能力学习进阶框架,并描述其进阶水平,再结合测评数据和言语报告进行校验,从认知动作、认知对象、认知条件三个方面修正学习进阶水平。研究为系统构建语文关键能力进阶框架提供了研究样例,为开展指向鉴赏评价能力进阶的阅读教学提供了理论依据,为设计鉴赏评价能力的过程性评价提供了参考思路。 Clarifying the stages of students'cognitive development and the pathways of thinking enhancement is crucial for effectively implementing the new Chinese language curriculum standards and fostering students'key competency.This study draws on international learning progression theories alongside practical experiences to construct a framework that delineates the progressive development of appreciation and evaluation ability,outlining distinct levels of progression.Subsequently,it integrates assessment data and speech reports to refine these levels from three perspectives:cognitive actions,cognitive objects,and cognitive conditions.This study exemplifies a systematic approach to constructing a progressive framework for key competency of Chinese language and literature,providing a theoretical basis for conducting reading instruction aimed at advancing appreciation and evaluation skills and presenting valuable insights for designing formative assessments of appreciation and evaluation.
作者 王彤彦 张晓毓 王家祺 WANG Tongyan;ZHANG Xiaoyu;WANG Jiaqi(Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences,Beijing 100036,China)
出处 《中国考试》 北大核心 2024年第10期43-53,共11页 journal of China Examinations
基金 北京教育科学研究院2023年度科研项目“基于学习进阶的中小学教学设计与评价研究”。
关键词 学习进阶 中学语文 鉴赏评价 过程性评价 核心素养 教育评价改革 learning progression Chinese language and literature appreciation and evaluation formative assessment key competency education assessment reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献94

  • 1林崇德.论学科能力的建构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997(1):5-12. 被引量:149
  • 2戴海崎 张峰 陈雪枫.心理与教育测量[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2001.117-118,282.
  • 3Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
  • 4B6guin, A. A., Hanson, B. A., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000, April) Effect of multidimensionality on separate and concurrent estimation in IRT equating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
  • 5Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
  • 6Briggs, D. C., & Weeks, J. P. (2009). The impact of vertical scaling decisions on growth interpretations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4), 3-14.
  • 7Chin, T. Y., Kim, W., & Nering, M. L. (2006, April). Five statistical factors that influence IRT vertical scaling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • 8Custer, M., Omar, M. H., & Pomplun, M. (2006). Vertical scaling with the Rasch model utilizing default and tight convergence settings with WlNSTEPS and BILOG MG. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 133-149.
  • 9Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57(3), 423-436.
  • 10Embretson, S. E. (2007). Construct validity: A universal validity system or just another test evaluation procedure?Educational Researcher, 36(8), 449-455.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部