期刊文献+

风切变下评价方法对高速列车振动舒适性评价结果的影响

Effect of evaluation methods on vibration comfort evaluation results of high-speed trains under wind shear
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学合理地评价乘坐舒适性对于风区高速列车运行性能的提升至关重要。针对在大风专项试验中发现的新问题,既有平稳性指标在风切变下的评价结果,与司乘人员实际感受差异巨大,表明现有舒适性指标在风切变下的应用存在局限开展研究。首先,对既有不同振动舒适性评价方法Sperling指标、ISO-2631、EN-12999、UIC-513、以及GB-5599等进行了系统梳理和评估差异的理论分析;其次,结合不同评价方法要求,通过多体动力学方法和人体动力学参数模型,建立了可一体描述车体与人体动力学影响的六自由度列车—座椅—人体耦合模型;在此基础上,进一步将风切变下实测列车气动载荷作为输入激励,分析了真实气动载荷作用下现有舒适性指标评估流程、频率加权曲线等对评价结果的影响,揭示了评价结果产生差异的原因;最后,基于既有振动舒适性评价方法,对风切变下高速列车振动舒适性的评价从指标参数、测点位置以及评价过程3个方面进行了建议和补充。研究结果表明:由于频率加权曲线和对各个方向振动的考虑形式不同,导致不同评价方法对人体敏感频率的侧重和振动形式的权重存在差异;建议风切变下振动舒适的评价方法将侧滚角速度和角加速度纳入并增加相应测点位置,同时旋转振动幅值可对转动舒适性进行评价,能在一定程度上反映出风切变下转动振动对振动舒适性的影响。 Scientific and reasonable evaluation of ride comfort is crucial to improving the operating performance of high-speed trains in windy areas.This study was conducted to address new issues discovered in special tests under strong winds.There was a significant difference between the evaluation results of existing stability indicators and the actual feelings of drivers and passengers under wind shear,indicating that there are limitations in the application of existing comfort indicators.First,the existing different vibration comfort evaluation methods such as the Sperling index,ISO-2631,EN-12999,UIC-513,and GB-5599 were systematically sorted out and theoretically compared to evaluate the differences.Secondly,combined with the requirements of different evaluation methods,six-degree-of-freedom train-seat-human body coupling model was established through the multi-body dynamics method and the human body dynamics parameter model,which can integrally describe the influence of the car body and human body dynamics.On this basis,the measured train aerodynamic load under wind shear was further used as input excitation,and the impact of the existing comfort index evaluation process and frequency weighting curve on the evaluation results under the action of the real aerodynamic load was analyzed,revealing the reasons for differences in the evaluation results.Finally,based on the existing vibration comfort evaluation methods,suggestions and supplements are made for the evaluation of vibration comfort of high-speed trains under wind shear from three aspects:index parameters,measurement point locations,and evaluation process.The results show that due to the different frequency weighting curves and different forms of consideration of vibration in various directions,different evaluation methods have differences in the emphasis on human body-sensitive frequencies and the weight of vibration forms.It is recommended that the evaluation method of vibration comfort under wind shear include roll angular velocity and angular acceleration and increase the corresponding measurement point positions.At the same time,the rotational vibration amplitude can reflect the impact of rotational vibration on vibration comfort under wind shear.
作者 刘东润 李田 钟睦 鲁寨军 LIU Dongrun;LI Tian;ZHONG Mu;LU Zhaijun(Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track,Ministry of Education,School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China;Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety,School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China;National&Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Safety Technology for Rail Vehicle,School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China)
出处 《铁道科学与工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第9期3493-3506,共14页 Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFB4300304) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52302447,52388102)。
关键词 高速列车 风切变 舒适性 评价方法 标准 high-speed train wind shear comfort evaluation method standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1梁习锋,熊小慧.4种车型横向气动性能分析与比较[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,37(3):607-612. 被引量:22
  • 2缪炳荣,肖守讷,金鼎昌.应用Simpack对复杂机车多体系统建模与分析方法的研究[J].机械科学与技术,2006,25(7):813-816. 被引量:27
  • 3任尊松,徐宇工,王璐雷,邱英政.强侧风对高速列车运行安全性影响研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(6):46-50. 被引量:90
  • 4Majka M, Hartnett M. Dynamic response of bridges to moving trains[ J ]. Computers & Structures, 2009,87 (19) : 1233 1252.
  • 5Japaness Industrial Standards Committes. JISH4100--2006. Aluminium and aluminiurn alloy extruded shape [ S]. Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association, 2006.
  • 6Cossalter V, Doria A, Garbin S, et al. Frequency-domain method for evaluating the ride comfort of a motorcycle[J ]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2006,44 (3) : 339 - 355.
  • 7铁道部劳动卫生研究所.GB/T13670-2000铁道车辆乘客及乘务员所承受的振动的测量与分析[S].北京:标准出版社,2000.
  • 8International Union of Railways. UIC513-1994, Guide-lines for evaluating passenger comfort in relation to vibration in railvary vehicles[S]. Paris: International Railway Association, 1994.
  • 9铁道部标准所.GB5599-85铁道车辆动力学性能评定和试验鉴定规范[S].北京:标准出版社,2000.
  • 10Blekhman II. Vibration mechanics[M]. Singapore; World Scientific Press, 2000.

共引文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部