摘要
【目的】从多维指标角度对我国医学类英文期刊的综合影响力进行评价,为期刊评价体系的优化和发展提供新思路。【方法】以75种我国出版的医学类英文期刊为数据源,从学术影响力、期刊声誉、社会影响力3个维度共选择14个指标构建指标体系。采用熵权法结合因子分析来计算各指标权重,并通过TOPSIS法计算各指标的综合得分。【结果】实证研究表明,学术影响力、期刊声誉和社会影响力3个维度互相促进。对科研成果的收藏、添加书签等交互行为比在社交媒体、新闻、博客等传播渠道的提及更能提升期刊的综合影响力。【结论】引入期刊声誉与社会影响力指标有助于综合反映期刊的多维影响力,在一定程度上全面体现期刊的发展情况。
[Purposes]This study aims to comprehensively assess the influence of China's international medical journals from multiple dimensions and provide new insights for the optimization and development of journal evaluation systems.[Methods]We selected 75 international medical journals in China as the data source.A total of 14 indicators were chosen to construct an index system across three dimensions:academic impact,journal reputation,and social impact.The entropy weighting method,combined with factor analysis,was used to calculate the weight of each indicator,and the TOPSIS method was employed to calculate the comprehensive scores of each indicator.[Findings]The research demonstrates that the three dimensions mentioned above mutually enhance each other.Actions such as adding research results to collections and bookmarking them significantly contribute to the improvement of a journal's comprehensive influence,more than mentions on social media,news,and blogs.[Conclusions]Incorporating indicators of reputation and social impact into the evaluation systems provides a comprehensive assessment of the multidimensional influence of journals,offering a more complete picture of the development of journals.
作者
刘宇舸
丁佐奇
LIU Yuge;DING Zuoqi(School of International Pharmaceutical Business,China Pharmaceutical University,24 Tongjiaxiang,Gulou District,Nanjing 210009,China;Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines,China Pharmaceutical University,24 Tongjiaxiang,Gulou District,Nanjing 210009,China)
出处
《中国科技期刊研究》
北大核心
2024年第8期1134-1143,共10页
Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金
中国高校科技期刊研究会与施普林格·自然(Springer Nature)中国办公室联合项目“英文编辑及国际交流人才培养基金项目”(CUJS-GJHZ-2022-02)。
关键词
科技评价
TOPSIS法
期刊评价
因子分析
Science and technology evaluation
TOPSIS method
Journal evaluation
Factor analysis