我国人文社科领域的学术期刊评价:理论拓展、多源数据与方法创新

Evaluation of academic journals in field of humanities and social sciences in China: Theoretical expansion, multi-source data, and methodological innovation

【目的】系统探讨新形势下我国人文社科领域的学术期刊评价,关注理论指导评价方案、数据支撑评价实践和方法落实评价工作。【方法】采用文献调研、逻辑分析、归纳总结等方法,基于本土实践和国际经验,构建人文社科学术期刊评价的三维框架。【结果】理论逻辑上,基于人文社科研究范式,探讨从统一标准到分类评价的调整、从学术影响力到社会影响力的拓展、从总结性评价到诊断和建议性评价的转变,为评价方案的制定提供理论依据;多源数据上,针对人文社科多源异构的数据特征,设计数据库建设宏观建设路径与微观建设单元,以保障评价实践的科学性;方法落实上,针对人文社科领域的期刊评价难点,强调同行评议与科学计量的拓展与融合。【结论】我国人文社科学术期刊评价需要在政策导向和本土实践的基础上,借鉴国际经验,从理论、数据和方法3个维度探讨契合中国特色的人文社科学术期刊评价发展进路。

[Purposes]This study aims to systematically explore the evaluation of academic journals in the humanities and social sciences in China under the new situation,focusing on theoretical guidance for evaluation schemes,data-supported evaluation practices,and methodological implementation of evaluation work.[Methods]Using methods such as literature review,logical analysis,and summarization,based on local practices and international experience,we constructed a three-dimensional framework for evaluating academic journals in the humanities and social sciences.[Findings]In terms of theoretical logic,based on the paradigm of humanities and social sciences research,adjustments from uniform standards to classified evaluations,expansions from academic influence to social impact,and transitions from summative evaluation to formative evaluation are discussed,providing a theoretical basis for the formulation of evaluation schemes.Regarding multi-source data,addressing the heterogeneous data characteristics of the humanities and social sciences,macroscopic and microscopic paths for database construction are designed to support the scientificity of evaluation practices.In terms of methodological implementation,addressing the challenges of journal evaluation in the humanities and social sciences,emphasis is placed on the expansion and integration of peer review and scientometric analysis.[Conclusions]The evaluation of journals in the humanities and social sciences in China needs to draw on international experience based on policy orientation and local practices,exploring development paths for evaluation schemes tailored to Chinese characteristics from three dimensions:theory,data,and methodology.