期刊文献+

辅助人员过错时马术运动员兴奋剂责任认定研究

Study on the Identification of Equestrian Athletes'Anti-Doping Responsibilities in Cases of Auxiliary Personnel's Violation
原文传递
导出
摘要 马术项目的反兴奋剂管理涉及多方辅助人员,却未对辅助人员的兴奋剂违规处罚进行单独规定。国际马术联合会(FEI)在马匹兴奋剂违规处罚中确定由运动员对辅助人员过错行为承担全部责任。随着越来越多的马术兴奋剂纠纷上诉至国际体育仲裁院(CAS),现有判例表明CAS仲裁庭承认FEI在多个相关处罚决定中确实存在兴奋剂处罚规则适用不当、违规证明责任失衡、兴奋剂责任划分方式不清等问题,影响运动员兴奋剂责任认定,加剧了反兴奋剂管理与运动员权利保障的冲突。通过对CAS仲裁庭类案分析,辅助人员过错行为可酌情纳入运动员减免处罚的考量范围,确定以区分原则为认定前提、个人过错为处罚基础、以多方协商为缓和路径的认定步骤,为完善马术兴奋剂责任认定提供有效指引,保障运动员的正当权益。研究建议:在体育法治化背景下,我国马术协会应与国际发展接轨,结合马术项目的特点,通过制定辅助人员行为规范、发布运动员指南、加强辅助人员监管等方式,提高运动员对兴奋剂责任的认识水平,实现反兴奋剂管理与运动员权利保护的和谐共进。 The anti-doping management of the equestrian involves multiple auxiliary personnel,yet no separate regulations have been established for the punishment of auxiliary personnel's doping violations.The Federation Equestre Internationale(FEI)has determined that athletes bear full responsibility for the faulty behaviors of auxiliary personnel in the context of equestrian anti-doping rule violations.With more and more equestrian doping disputes appealed to the International Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS),existing case precedents indicate that the CAS arbitral tribunal acknowledges issues such as improper application of doping regulations,imbalanced burden of proof for violations,and unclear division of anti-doping responsibilities in multiple related penalty decisions made by the FEI,which have affected the identification of athletes'anti-doping responsibilities and aggravated the conflict between anti-doping management and athletes'rights protection.Through the analysis of CAS cases,the faulty behaviors of auxiliary personnel can be discretionarily included in the consideration for athletes'mitigation of punishment.This paper proposes an identification process based on the principle of differentiation as a prerequisite,individual fault as the basis of sanction,and multi-party consultation as a mitigation path,so as to provid effective guidance for improving the identification of equestrian anti-doping liability and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of athletes.Research Suggestions:Under the background of sports legalization,China's equestrian association should align with international development,combine with the characteristics of equestrian,and improve athletes'awareness of anti-doping liability by formulating codes of conduct for auxiliary personnel,issuing athlete guidelines,and strengthening the supervision of auxiliary personnel,thereby achieving a harmonious coexistence between antidoping management and athlete rights protection.
作者 乔一涓 许益奇 QIAO Yijuan;XU Yiqi(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,Hunan China)
出处 《北京体育大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第6期110-121,共12页 Journal of Beijing Sport University
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“新时代中国特色体育法学学科、学术、话语体系建设研究”(项目编号:21BTY012)。
关键词 反兴奋剂 马术项目 辅助人员 运动员权利 处罚规则 责任认定 anti-doping equestrian auxiliary personnel athlete rights penalty regulations identification of responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨兴培.论共同犯罪人的分类依据与立法完善[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1996,18(5):53-57. 被引量:22
  • 2孙英民.从云梦秦简看秦律“连坐”法[J].中原文物,1986(2):100-104. 被引量:4
  • 3[美]E·霍贝尔.《原始人的法》,严存生等译,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1992年,第261-262页.
  • 4[日]曾根威彦.《刑法学基础》,黎宏译,北京:法律出版社,2005年版,第252-253页.
  • 5[法]卡斯东·斯特法尼.《法国刑法总论精义》,罗结珍译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:88.
  • 6[德]诺贝特·埃利亚斯.2003.《个体的社会》,翟三江,陆兴华译,北京:译林出版社
  • 7[德]黑格尔.《法哲学原理》,范扬,张企泰译,北京:商务印书馆,1982年,第175,196,197页.
  • 8高铭暄主编.《刑法学原理》(第1卷),北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993年版,第418页.
  • 9《汉谟拉比法典》,杨炽译,北京:高等教育出版社,1992年版,第64、116、122、124页.
  • 10世界著名法典汉译丛书编委会编.《萨利克法典》,北京:法律出版社,2000年版,第37-38页.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部