村集体与农户利益协同的宅基地“三权”分置逻辑与模式比较研究

Comparative Study on the Logic and Model of Rural Homestead“Tripartite Entitlement System”in Which the Interests of Rural Collectives and Rural Households Coordinated

当前农村村集体利益与农户利益不协同的矛盾,严重阻碍着农村宅基地制度改革的成效。因此村集体与农户利益协同是宅基地“三权”分置实现的前摄目标。本文构建了宅基地要素—权益—目标“三位一体”“村集体—农户”利益协同的理论分析框架,运用扎根理论分析比较三个试点地区的案例,构建耦合式嵌入型、诱导式融合型和变迁式梯度型等治理模式的矩阵模型。研究发现,通过协同村集体利益与农户利益为目标,可以破解宅基地“三权”分置改革的多重阻碍,可以最大化提升“三权”的各自价值以及合成效能,促进城乡融合发展,助推宅基地的中国式现代化治理。

At present,the contradiction between rural collective interests and the interests of rural households is seriously hindering the effectiveness of rural homestead system reform.Therefore,the benefit coordination between rural collectives and rural households is the proactive goal to realize“tripartite entitlement system”of homestead.This paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of the homestead trinity of elements-equities-objectives and“rural collectives-rural households”benefit synergy,uses the grounded theory analysis method to compare multiple cases in three pilot areas,and builds the matrix models of governance modes such as coupling embedment,induction fusion and transition gradient.The research finds that by coordinating both the interests of rural collectives and the interests of rural households as the goal,the multiple obstacles in the reform of“tripartite entitlement system”of residential land can be broken,and the respective values and synthesis efficiency of the“tripartite entitlement”can be maximized to promote integrated development of urban and rural areas and nudge the Chinese-style modernization of homestead institution management.