简化版Piper疲劳量表的汉化及信效度检验

Chinese version of the Piper Fatigue Scale⁃12 and its reliability and validity test

目的:将简化版Piper疲劳量表(the Piper Fatigue Scale-12,PFS-12)进行汉化并检验其信效度。方法:经原量表作者授权后,遵循Brislin量表翻译原则对PFS-12进行汉化形成中文版PFS-12。选取2023年4月—10月十堰市某三级甲等医院血液净化中心的415例血液透析病人进行调查,评价中文版PFS-12的信效度。结果:中文版PFS-12包括4个维度,共12个条目。总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.935,分半信度为0.904,重测信度为0.973。中文版PFS-12的量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.93,条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.82~1.00。中文版PFS-12各维度得分及总分与中文修订版Piper疲劳量表(RPFS)总分的相关系数为0.736~0.961(P<0.01)。探索性因子分析共提取4个因子,累计方差贡献率为82.329%;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合指标良好。结论:中文版PFS-12具有良好的信效度,可用于我国血液透析病人疲劳状况的评估。

Objective:To translate the Piper Fatigue Scale-12(PFS-12)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:Authorized by the author of the original scale,the PFS-12 was translated into Chinese version of PFS-12 according to the Brislin scale translation principle.A total of 415 hemodialysis patients in the blood purification center of a tertiary grade A hospital in Shiyan city from April to October 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method to test the reliability and validity.Results:The Chinese version of PFS-12 included 4 dimensions and 12 items.The Cronbach´sαcoefficient of the total volume table was 0.935,the split half reliability was 0.904,and the retest reliability was 0.973.The scale-level content validity index(S-CVI)of the Chinese version PFS-12 was 0.93.The item-level content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.82 to 1.00.The correlation coefficients between the scores of PFS-12 and Revised Piper Fatigue Scale(RPFS)ranged from 0.736 to 0.961(P<0.01).Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors,and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 82.329%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well.Conclusions:The Chinese version of PFS-12 has good reliability and validity,and it can be used to evaluate the fatigue status of hemodialysis patients in China.